A LEGAL challenge to the UK Government’s effective block on glass in Scotland’s deposit return scheme (DRS) is “unlikely to be fruitful”, according to Deputy First Minister Shona Robison.
The UK Government’s decision to offer only a partial exemption to the Internal Market Act – the trade rules governing the countries of the UK – for the scheme, excluding glass and imposing other conditions, resulted in the DRS being delayed again.
Lorna Slater, the Scottish Government minister tasked with implementing the initiative, announced on Wednesday it will be delayed until the English scheme is due to go live, which she said will be October 2025 at the earliest.
Robison said the Scottish Government had explored the possibility of a legal challenge but success seemed unlikely due to the Internal Market Act.
READ MORE: SNP offer £95,000 in hunt for 'dynamic' new chief executive
She told the PA news agency on Thursday: “We, of course, have taken advice on all of these matters and we believed that it would be unlikely that that would be a fruitful way forward.
“The UK Government hold the ace cards here with the fact that they have the IMA exemption, they hold that card.
“It’s very difficult to find a workaround to that.”
Robison added the move was an “attack on devolution”, saying: “This was a scheme agreed in the Scottish Parliament, that included glass.
“Of course, up until January, everybody was assuming that it was full steam ahead, including glass.
“So this is a last-minute intervention led by the Secretary of State for Scotland to fundamentally undermine the scheme and undermine devolution.”
She said the pressure is now on the UK Government to deliver its scheme on time.
The Scottish DRS has now been delayed numerous times, but many retailers have already put in place the necessary infrastructure that allows consumers to return containers and receive their deposits back.
Asked if the Scottish Government will offer compensation to businesses whose equipment will now lay idle until at least October 2025, Robison said: “We’re going to be working with businesses around making sure that the investment they have made aligns with the UK scheme, which is why the UK Government needs to get their scheme up and running in 2025 – they are going to be held to account for that.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel