BORIS Johnson has reportedly failed in his attempt to ennoble his father in his resignation honours list has failed, according to reports.
However, the former prime minister has succeeded in his nominations of aides who served with him during the Downing Street parties scandal.
Several senior Johnson aides who were with him during the parties scandal have been nominated for honours, including Martin Reynolds, according to The Times.
In May 2020, Reynolds invited people to the Number 10 garden for “socially distanced drinks”, at which around 200 people were invited to “bring your own booze”, breaking Covid restrictions.
He later said: “We seem to have got away with it”.
Johnson’s honours list that has been approved by Rishi Sunak reportedly has 50 aides, party donors and Tory MPs and will be published this afternoon.
Nadine Dorries, the former culture secretary, and Alok Sharma, the former COP26 president, had been expected to stand down to take peerages, leaving Sunak facing two by-elections.
READ MORE: Nadine Dorries steps down as MP 'with immediate effect'
However, a Whitehall source said that both were taken off the list yesterday over concerns about the damaging impact of the by-elections.
Last night a source told The Times who is familiar with the process said Dorries and Sharma had been resubmitted to the House of Lords appointments committee for vetting and their peerages were likely to be granted at a later date.
Downing Street had been reportedly “uncomfortable” with Johnson’s proposal that his father receive a knighthood, believing it a reputational risk for the current Prime Minister.
A government source told The Times: “It just would have looked terrible.”
The nomination had prompted accusations that Johnson was using the honours system to reward family members. In 2020 he nominated his brother Jo, a former minister, for a peerage. He is now Lord Johnson of Marylebone.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel