A CLIP of Douglas Ross claiming that he believes Boris Johnson is a “truthful man” has resurfaced in the wake of a new report which found the former PM repeatedly lied to Parliament.
The Privileges Committee said that it would have recommended a 90-day suspension for Johnson had he still been a sitting MP.
It said his comments on the committee carrying out its work amounted to “an attack on our democratic institutions”.
Why is Douglas Ross not facing questions about Boris Johnson today? This is why.
— MSM Monitor (@msm_monitor) June 15, 2023
Be a shame for Douglas if this was to be shared and retweeted. pic.twitter.com/ou7ULqzXrj
During an interview with BBC Radio Scotland in April 2022, Douglas Ross was asked if the then-prime minister was a “truthful man” amid questions over lockdown parties.
The Scottish Tory leader replied: “Yes. And he’s dealing with the situation in Ukraine and he’s dealing with the situation at home here.”
Ross did stress that it was important for Johnson to explain the circumstances around his police fine to the House of Commons, however.
Johnson, his wife Carrie and then-chancellor Rishi Sunak were all given fixed penalty notices for their part in lockdown-busting parties at the height of the pandemic.
READ MORE: Beth Rigby reports SNP MP recommended 'explosion' of Boris Johnson
Many took to Twitter to question Ross’s thinking at the time, asking him what he would make in light of the release of the Privileges Committee report.
“Douglas Ross must regret this. Wonder what he will be saying today”, one user commented.
As Johnson is no longer an MP, the committee could not recommend him for suspension.
However, the MPs who formed it said that he should be denied a former members’ pass – barring him from the Houses of Parliament.
MPs will be given a chance to vote on the recommendations of the report on Monday.
Johnson launched a fresh attack on the report shortly after its release, saying: “This is rubbish. It is a lie.
“This is a dreadful day for MPs and for democracy.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel