DOUGLAS Ross has been accused of “deflecting” from the “serious scandal” of Boris Johnson misleading parliament, the First Minister has said, after the leaders clashed over dualling the A9.
Earlier on Thursday, the House of Commons Privileges Committee released their report which found Johnson had “deliberately” misled Parliament, and on more than one occasion, regarding whether Covid-19 rules were adhered to in Number 10 during nationwide lockdowns.
During FMQs in Holyrood, Humza Yousaf and the Scottish Tory leader clashed on the deadline for dualling the A9, after a number of accidents have sadly taken lives on the dangerous road on the east coast.
🗣️ 'Nobody in this country will forget that Douglas Ross backed Boris Johnson to the very hilt' @HumzaYousaf said the Scottish Tory leader was trying to 'dodge' and 'deflect' from today's report about the former PM pic.twitter.com/usiAiLrmBK
— The National (@ScotNational) June 15, 2023
Ross claimed that it was “unprecedented” that a Government Initiated Question (GIQ) lodged on Monday relating to the A9 was later rescinded.
The First Minister insisted that this was due to the appointment of Fiona Hyslop as Transport Minister on Tuesday – a brief which was also given to Cabinet Secretary Mairi McAllan – and that he had asked the department to review the timetable for dualling the road.
Ross repeatedly pushed on the GIQ, claiming that Yousaf was “getting annoyed” at his repeated questions.
The First Minister could be overheard saying “no I’m not,” and shaking his head at the Scottish Tory leader.
READ MORE: Clip of Douglas Ross calling Boris Johnson a 'truthful man' resurfaces
“This is desperate stuff from Douglas Ross who is trying to dodge, no doubt, deflect, of course from the serious scandal of Boris Johnson engulfing his party,” the First Minister told the chamber.
“With Boris Johnson, not just lying to the House of Commons, of course, but the people of this country and the UK, when they of course, could not attend the funeral of a loved one.”
As jeers from the Tory benches grew louder, Yousaf said they “should not be shouting this down”.
“Nobody in this country will forget that Douglas Ross backed Boris Johnson to the hilt,” he blasted.
Ross was criticised for his shifting position on the former prime minister. He was one of the first senior members of the party to call for him to quit in the wake of the partygate scandal breaking, before rescinding those calls after the Russian invasion of Ukraine, citing the need for a unified response to the crisis.
He eventually voted against Johnson in a confidence ballot last June, which precipitated the then prime minister leaving office the following month.
GIQs are generally used to allow ministers to make announcements on specific subjects. Monday's GIQ was lodged by SNP MSP Jim Fairlie, but the question was later withdrawn.
Ross claimed that this meant an announcement had been cancelled, but the First Minister insisted that the decision was made due to allow further input from Hyslop as she takes on the Transport Minister role.
READ MORE: Douglas Ross declines to say if Boris Johnson is still an 'honest man'
Yousaf said: “If [Douglas Ross] was here in this chamber, he would have seen that of course we have a new transport team in place.
“It is only right, of course, that I have asked that transport team to look at the detail of the dualling of the A9.”
It is not clear what the Scottish Government planned to announce, if anything, in relation to the road when the GIQ was first tabled. An announcement is now expected in the autumn.
Meanwhile, the First Minister reiterated his promise to complete the long-awaited dualling project, which brought campaigner Laura Hansler to the Scottish Parliament this week to testify.
Yousaf said: “We are, I am, this Government is absolutely committed to dualling the A9.”
It came as Scottish Labour's Anas Sarwar raised the case of Martin Graham, a 76-year-old man who lives on the Isle of Lewis. Graham was told he faces "delay and disruption" to his cancer treatment due to a lack of oncologists.
Graham's cancer returned despite having a tumour removed, and he has been "anxiously" waiting to hear when his treatment would start. However, he instead received a letter setting out that there would be delays to his treatment until a replacement oncologist can be found.
Sarwar asked: “After 16 years of SNP Government, why is there no oncologist anywhere in Scotland to treat Mr Graham?”
The First Minister said he would be happy to look into the detail of the case Sarwar raised.
READ MORE: Humza Yousaf rejects claims of police and media collusion in SNP probe
There is a global shortage of oncologists, he said, and work to increase the numbers in Scotland has been ongoing since 2007.
Yousaf said the NHS is still working through a significant backlog, and performance against the 31-day target for decision to treat cancer is closer to the desired level.
He said: “I want him [Sarwar] to be assured that there has been action and there will continue to be action to increase the number of consultant radiologists and consultant oncologists working in Scotland.”
The First Minister also noted that “more and more people” are now coming through cancer pathways.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel