THE BBC is facing questions after a former Ukip candidate appeared in the audience on Thursday evening’s Question Time.
Broadcasting from Deeside, among the topics discussed on the show was the Privileges Committee report into Boris Johnson.
One of those to ask a question was Cain Griffiths, who stood for Ukip in a by-election last year for the City of Chester.
The seat was won by Labour’s Samantha Dixon, with Griffiths gaining a total of 179 votes.
Today, on @bbcquestiontime I highlighted the fact that people in this country voted for Boris because they were crying out for an alternative!
— Cain Griffiths (@griffiths_cain) June 15, 2023
Now Boris is gone, they seriously need to up their game, but of course they won't! It is time for REAL change in British politics! pic.twitter.com/lVimmseJD5
According to the BBC’s website: “Question Time selects local audiences which reflect a broad range of political views”.
Producers then get in touch “to ask questions on their previous voting record and future voting intentions, whether they have party political membership and also how they voted in the EU referendum”.
READ MORE: Question Time: Fiona Bruce slammed for 'unacceptable framing' of SNP
It adds: “A diverse range of British opinion must be represented. In observing due impartiality, political fairness, and our intent to represent that wide range of views, our audience broadly reflects the electoral map of the nation in which we are broadcasting.”
Good to see @reformparty_uk third biggest party on Derby Council pic.twitter.com/9IlXBIHuwG
— Liam 🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧 (@liam345) May 7, 2023
The Alyn and Deeside constituency is represented by Labour and has been since the seat was first created in 1983.
However, many Twitter users queried why the fact Griffiths was a Ukip candidate was not made clear.
“Apparently, they check people’s backgrounds before letting them in. But miraculously, Cain Griffiths from Ukip - a party nobody votes for anymore - gets on and is one of the first audience members to get an airing”, commented one Twitter user.
The person clarified their comment to say they were not saying Griffiths “should not be on Question Time” but that it “should be made clear he stands for a particular political party, not as some random member of the audience”.
More recently on his social media, Griffiths has shown support for the Reform Party. A recent retweet showed he was pleased to see them as the “third-biggest party on Derby Council”.
Another viewer said they had “lost trust” in the BBC because of Griffiths’ appearance while someone else added that it “showed a true disregard for true representation”.
What did Griffiths say on the show?
Griffiths spoke during the segment on Johnson and on his Twitter said that he wanted to highlight that people voted for the former PM because they “wanted an alternative”.
On Question Time, he said: “I’m not a fan of Boris. I think he told too many lies, you know a pathological liar.
READ MORE: Question Time: SNP issue response to Fiona Bruce interruptions
“But I think Boris could make a comeback and it’s not because he’s particularly special but it’s rather because of the inability of the establishment politicians to tap into what people want.
“Boris had his faults, but at least he spoke in plain English. He had a bold and clear vision, unlike his successor, Rishi Sunak, who is just a conveyor-belt politician.
“No real plan.”
The BBC has been contacted for comment.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel