THE scandal-hit hedge fund set up by Crispin Odey is being broken up as it confirmed talks to transfer some of its funds to rival firms amid an intensifying crisis following sexual misconduct allegations against its founder.
Odey Asset Management (OAM) said in a letter to clients that it was “in advanced discussions” to offload some of its activities and staff to other asset managers.
OAM is known for highly leveraged bets on global equities, debt, currencies and commodities. Besides OAM, the group also runs Brook Asset Management and Odey Wealth.
It is reportedly affecting the majority of its 4.4 billion US dollars (£5.3bn) in assets under management.
It comes as the group has been battling to contain the fallout after the Financial Times published a series of allegations of sexual harassment or misconduct against Odey, which he denies.
READ MORE: Boris Johnson deliberately lied to Parliament, committee finds
Allegations have been made against Odey in the past. In 2021 he was found not guilty in a court case where he was accused of an indecent assault which had allegedly happened in 1998.
Odey, 64, founded the asset management firm which bears his name in 1991.
Former British Chancellor Kwasi Kwarteng was once an adviser to OAM and Odey was a leading backer of Brexit and a donor to the Conservative Party.
OAM has since broken some of its ties with Odey, saying on Saturday that he will “no longer have any economic or personal involvement in the partnership”.
It also announced plans to rebrand the partnership, which will see Odey’s name removed from the hedge fund.
But the crisis has already led to customers rushing to remove their money from the funds that Odey manages and companies that provide vital services to OAM have moved to sever ties.
OAM had already moved to halt withdrawals from two of its funds and closed another amid the investor exodus, while it emerged that JP Morgan Chase had given notice to end its relationship with the firm, following the lead of Morgan Stanley, Goldman Sachs and Exane last week.
In a letter sent to investors on Wednesday, OAM said: “We have been, and remain, in constructive dialogue with our service providers and key counterparties.
“It has, however, become clear that some investment management activities of the partnership are affected by recent events.
“Given that, the firm is now in advanced discussions for rehousing funds and transferring certain fund management activities and individuals to other asset managers.
“Any sale or rehousing is considered subject, of course, to any relevant regulatory approvals and due diligence, with a view to an orderly transition of any assets and investors.
“The fund boards and managers are also appraised and supportive of this approach.”
The business added: “Acting in the best interest of our investors and our staff has continued to be our primary concern over the past few days.”
Odey has denied the allegations published in the FT last week, telling the paper they are “rubbish”.
The newspaper – together with Tortoise Media – said last week that it had spoken to 13 women who claimed they were abused or harassed by the 64-year-old fund manager.
The alleged incidents happened between 1998 and 2021 and involved women who had either worked for Odey Asset Management or had professional dealings with Odey.
It was not the first time that people had made claims about Odey’s behaviour.
In 2021 he was found not guilty in a court case in which he was accused of an indecent assault which allegedly happened in 1998.
The Treasury committee is set to quiz the UK’s financial regulator over how it has handled allegations of sexual misconduct against Odey and what action it has taken, with the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) reported to have been privately investigating the business prior to the FT’s report.
The watchdog was reportedly given a report of Odey’s conduct in early 2021 after the firm took disciplinary action against him and has been asked by the committee to confirm if this is true.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel