HUMZA Yousaf has launched a new paper detailing how the constitution of an independent Scotland would be drawn up.
He unveiled the blueprint at an event in Glasgow on Monday morning.
Here are the key points from the document.
The constitution
The paper sets out the arguments for having a written constitution over the unwritten constitution of the United Kingdom.
It argues that because in the UK system, the Parliament has supremacy and any law – including fundamental rights or major institutions like the Scottish Parliament – could be scrapped by a simple majority of MPs.
READ MORE: Humza Yousaf launches new paper on Scottish independence
To prevent this from happening, the paper argues it is necessary to have a constitution which would enshrine certain rights and make them much harder – though not impossible – to overturn.
The route
There are three key steps outlined in the paper – the interim constitution, which would be followed by a permanent version which would be brought into force by a referendum.
The interim constitution would take effect from day one of independence, the paper says, and would be “based on the sovereignty of the people and reflect Scotland's values as a modern, democratic, European nation”.
Interim constitution
The paper sets out in broad terms what the interim constitution would look like. It says the document would enshrine in law the sovereignty of the people of Scotland, and set out the means by which they would be able to hold the parliament and government to account.
READ MORE: Neale Hanvey: Alex Salmond would’ve had us independent by now - but let’s unite for the future
The Scottish Government additionally proposes constitutional recognition for the National Health Service and the right to healthcare free at the point of need.
It said it would also make the interim constitution include commitments to hold a constitutional convention to define the permanent constitution and one to put Scotland on the path to nuclear disarmament.
It would broadly be based on the rights set out in the European Convention on Human Rights, the Scottish Government said, including rights of children, women, minority ethnic communities, disabled people and refugees, the right to a healthy environment, and the right to strike.
Permanent constitution
After independence, the Scottish Government proposes setting up a Constitutional Convention which would be “recruited from across Scotland, ensuring that a wide range of people, communities and organisations, including experts and representatives of different groups across society” are involved.
This group would consider what other rights might be included in the permanent constitution of Scotland – which the Government envisages as an “inclusive and an expansive process”.
Once the document is drafted, the paper adds, it would be presented to the Scottish Parliament for consideration by MSPs who would then put it to the people by means of a referendum.
If accepted this would become the permanent constitution, but the Scottish Government said it would make the case that it should be a “living document, capable of evolving over time in order to stay relevant”. This means bits could be added or subtracted.
The paper said there would be protections in place to make sure the constitution could not be altered by a simple parliamentary majority.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel