LABOUR’S clean energy plans have been slammed as “anti-Scottish” as Keir Starmer’s “credibility" is called into question by pro-indy parties.
It comes as the Labour leader used a speech in Edinburgh to outline his party’s plans to meet net zero.
Starmer argued for continued use of fossil fuels while banning new North Sea oil and gas exploration and said the headquarters of a new public energy company would be in Scotland.
Scotland’s pro-independence parties all widely condemned Starmer’s plans.
READ MORE: Greens rule out independence talks with Alex Salmond's Alba
Alba party leader Alex Salmond called them “anti-Scottish”, adding that Labour’s plans to halt North Sea oil and gas investment was “a great British sell out of Scotland”.
First Minister Humza Yousaf – speaking at the announcement of a new independence white paper on Monday – called into question whether anyone would trust Labour on the green economy after backtracking on its £28 billion green prosperity plan.
The Scottish Greens also attacked Starmer’s “credibility”, saying that the party doesn’t understand the climate crisis.
Former first minister Salmond said: “Labour’s plans are nonsensical, anti-green energy and anti-Scottish.
“No hydrocarbon province can operate on zero exploration and development. For a start, that’s where the jobs are concentrated. They would cost tens of thousands of skilled jobs in Scotland and provoke a collapse in high tech supply industries - the very companies needed by the growing offshore renewables sector.
"Instead of wrecking Scotland’s energy expertise, all parties should commit now to enforcing a carbon capture network across all the North Sea installations, by making it a condition of all new licences."
Salmond went on to dismiss Labour’s promise to locate “Great British Energy” in Scotland.
He said: “This is a replay of 50 years ago when Labour pledged that the British National Oil Corporation (BNOC) would be located in Scotland. But BNOC quickly became privatised Britoil and then disappeared into the maw of BP.
"What Scotland needs is its own public energy company - a Scottish National Renewables Corporation - to secure the public benefit from our people’s offshore renewable resource.”
The First Minister said that Labour governments had “squandered not tens but hundreds of billions (of pounds) of oil and gas revenue” and only invested a fraction of this in Scotland.
But he said Keir Starmer’s party is now asking Scots to “somehow be thankful that they are going to set up a part of a government department if they win a General Election”.
READ MORE: Key points you need to know about new independence paper
Yousaf went on to insist that the Scottish Government “don’t just talk the talk – we walk the walk” on green energy, pointing to the £500 million just transition fund pledged to help areas such as the north-east of Scotland transition from an economy based on fossil fuels to one focused on renewables.
Meanwhile, the Scottish Greens attacked Starmer’s “shocking admission” that Labour will wave through any Tory decision to grant a licence for the Rosebank oil and gas field near Shetland to go ahead.
Scottish Greens MSP Mark Ruskell, the party’s climate spokesperson, said: “The problem with Labour is you simply cannot trust them. Time and time again they have promised to do one thing, such as the green prosperity fund, only to U-turn.
“This Labour Party has sided with the Tories on Brexit, over refugees and now oil and gas. Now it hopes to plunder Scotland’s natural resources for Westminster again.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel