SNP MSP Fergus Ewing is reportedly set to lose the whip after backing a no-confidence motion in Greens minister Lorna Slater, reports suggest.
Lorna Slater survived a vote of no confidence in her position as circular economy minister on Tuesday, with opposition attempts to oust her failing at Holyrood over the Deposit Return Scheme.
The Scotsman has reported that party whips warned that voting in favour of the no-confidence motion relating to Slater on Tuesday would result in them losing the whip.
READ MORE: Labour MSP in law breach fears amid Margaret Ferrier petition
Ewing was the only SNP MSP to vote against the Scottish Government, alongside Tory, Labour and LibDem MSPs.
He said after voting for Slater’s removal: “The minister with responsibility for the scheme does not enjoy the confidence of business.
“I have therefore voted to seek a new minister appointed to take over this troubled matter to deal with the huge fallout of numerous compensation claims and reconsider afresh how best to achieve recycling objectives.”
Ewing (pictured above) is a long-term critic of the recycling scheme and has become a regular thorn in the side of his own party on a number of policies.
In May, he ripped up a copy of the Scottish Government’s Highly Protected Marine Areas (HPMAs) consultation during a member’s debate.
If Ewing loses the whip, he will be forced to sit as an Independent MSP.
An SNP spokesperson said: “We are pleased to have won this vote convincingly – one SNP MSP not abiding by the whip in this instance is an internal party matter, which will be considered by the chief whip in due course.”
More to follow...
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel