KEIR Starmer has been called out across the political spectrum after his party revealed plans to “appoint dozens” of new Labour peers to the House of Lords – despite having repeatedly pledged to abolish it altogether.
Scrapping the Lords formed a key plank of Starmer’s promises during his bid to become Labour leader, and in December, he told Sky News that he hoped to do away with the upper chamber altogether in his first term as prime minister.
But reports which emerged in The Times late on Tuesday quoted one shadow minister as saying a Labour-run UK Government would appoint “dozens of [new peers], at least”.
A second source told that paper that abolishing the Lords was “hardly mission critical”.
READ MORE: How many of Keir Starmer's '10 pledges' HASN'T he dropped yet?
Labour were also said to be planning to use those newly appointed Lords as ministers in government, amid what some senior party figures see as a lack of experience or talent among its MPs.
Labour’s argument is understood to be that the Lords is currently heavily weighted against them. According to the House of Lords’ website, there are 263 Tory peers, 183 crossbench, 84 LibDem, and 174 Labour peers.
There are also concerns that the Labour peers are too old, while the Conservatives have younger faces on the red benches.
Rather than abolishing the Lords – which would solve any issues Labour has with its makeup – Starmer is instead planning to try to stack it in his favour.
The U-turn on his key policy has been called out by both SNP and Conservative politicians.
You simply cannot believe a single word @Keir_Starmer says. https://t.co/Rg4kieYkEl pic.twitter.com/TAN7G0TbTL
— James Foster (@JamesEFoster) June 21, 2023
“You simply cannot believe anything Starmer says,” SNP constitution spokesperson Tommy Sheppard said.
He added: "Labour have been promising to abolish the House of Lords for 113 years, but they lack the backbone for any meaningful action.
"It will come as no surprise to voters in Scotland that, yet again, Sir Keir Starmer’s party is U-turning on another pledge. They're up to their old sleekit tricks again, and voters across the country can see right through their hollow promises."
SNP MP Chris Law added: “Stuffing the unelected house is Labour’s plans for electoral reform. If it behaves like a Tory……?”
And councillor Andrea Cowan added: “Sir Keir was never going to abolish the House of Lords – just another line he used when he felt it was needed.”
READ MORE: Fergus Ewing 'set to lose party whip' after vote against Lorna Slater
Tory employment minister Guy Opperman said he “thought Sir Keir had pledged to abolish the House of Lords”, while his Conservative MP colleague Mark Jenkinson wrote: “I thought Sir Flip-Flop was against handing out peerages and was going to abolish the House of Lords?”
Amid recent controversy around Boris Johnson’s resignation honours list, Starmer pledged to never create one of his own.
Starmer has also previously ruled out reforming Westminster’s “First Past the Post” voting system – which tends to produce majority governments – in favour of proportional representation – which more accurately represents how a populace votes.
Reports of Labour’s plan to stack the Lords with friendly figures come as Westminster’s Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee launches an inquiry into the upper chamber.
William Wragg, the committee’s chair, noted that there has “long been concern about its size, membership and the appointments process”.
“Previous inquiries from parliamentary committees concluded with clear recommendations to reduce the size of the chamber and reform the appointments process to maintain confidence in the Lords,” Wragg said.
"The Government committed to review the matter, yet five years on we have seen no sign of reform, and large numbers of new members continue to be appointed."
Since taking over as Labour leader, Starmer has also ditched pledges to nationalise energy, water, rail, and the Royal Mail, abolish tuition fees, and raise taxes on the highest earners.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel