A FORMER hot dog stand owner and low-profile businessman who benefited from having President Vladimir Putin as a powerful patron, Yevgeny Prigozhin was reportedly on a plane that crashed in Russia after a tumtuluous few months.
Prigozhin moved into the global spotlight thanks to Russia’s war in Ukraine, before mounting a short-lived armed mutiny against Russia’s military leadership in late June.
Since, the mercenary leader has remained in Belarus but it has been reported a business jet en route from Moscow to St Petersburg crashed on Wednesday, killing all ten people on board, Russian emergency officials said.
Mercenary chief Yevgeny Prigozhin was on the passenger list, officials said, but it was not clear if he was on board.
Unconfirmed media reports said the jet belonged to Prigozhin, founder of the Wagner private military company.
The Wagner leader and Russian President Vladimir Putin go way back, with both born in Leningrad, now St Petersburg.
During the final years of the Soviet Union, Prigozhin served time in prison – 10 years by his own admission, although he does not say what this was for.
READ MORE: Vladimir Putin faces armed rebellion from Wagner group
Afterwards, he owned a hot dog stand and then restaurants that drew interest from Putin.
In his first term, the Russian leader took then-French president Jacques Chirac to dine at one of these restaurants.
“Vladimir Putin saw how I built a business out of a kiosk, he saw that I don’t mind serving to the esteemed guests because they were my guests,” Prigozhin recalled in an interview published in 2011.
His businesses expanded significantly to catering and providing school lunches. In 2010, Putin helped open Prigozhin’s factory, which was built thanks to generous loans by a state bank.
In Moscow alone, his company Concord won millions of dollars in contracts to provide meals for schools.
He also organised catering for Kremlin events for several years – earning him the nickname “Putin’s chef” – and has provided catering and utility services to the Russian military.
In 2017, opposition figure and anti-corruption fighter Alexei Navalny accused Prigozhin’s companies of breaking competition laws by bidding for some 387 million dollars (£304 million) in defence ministry contracts.
Prigozhin’s Wagner Group has come to play a central role in Putin’s projection of Russian influence in trouble spots around the world.
The United States, European Union, United Nations and others say the mercenary force has involved itself in conflicts in countries across Africa in particular.
Wagner fighters allegedly provide security for national leaders or warlords in exchange for lucrative payments, often including a share of gold or other natural resources.
US officials say Russia may also be using Wagner’s work in Africa to support its war in Ukraine.
In Ukraine, Prigozhin’s mercenaries have become a major force in the war, fighting as counterparts to the Russian army in battles with Ukrainian forces.
That includes Wagner fighters taking Bakhmut, the city where the bloodiest and longest battles have taken place.
By last month, Wagner Group and Russian forces appeared to have largely won Bakhmut, a victory with strategically slight importance for Russia despite the cost in lives.
The US estimates that nearly half of the 20,000 Russian troops killed in Ukraine since December were Wagner fighters in Bakhmut. The soldiers-for-hire included inmates recruited from Russia’s prisons.
As his forces fought and died en masse in Ukraine, Prigozhin raged against Russia’s military top brass.
READ MORE: Cracks in Kremlin’s political facade may yet turn into major fissures
He accused Russia’s regular military of incompetence and of starving his troops of the weapons and ammunition they need to fight.
“These are someone’s fathers and someone’s sons,” Prigozhin said at the time.
“The scum that doesn’t give us ammunition will eat their guts in hell.”
Earlier, Prigozhin had gained more limited attention in the US, when he and a dozen other Russian nationals and three Russian companies were charged with operating a covert social media campaign aimed at fomenting discord ahead of Donald Trump’s 2016 election victory.
They were indicted as part of US special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation into Russian election interference.
The US treasury department has sanctioned Prigozhin and associates repeatedly in connection with both his alleged election interference and his leadership of the Wagner Group.
After the 2018 indictment, the RIA Novosti news agency quoted Prigozhin as saying: “Americans are very impressionable people; they see what they want to see. I treat them with great respect. I’m not at all upset that I’m on this list. If they want to see the devil, let them see him.”
The Biden White House called him “a known bad actor”, and US state department spokesman Ned Price said Prigozhin’s “bold confession, if anything, appears to be just a manifestation of the impunity that crooks and cronies enjoy under President Putin and the Kremlin”.
As Prigozhin grew more outspoken against the way Russia’s conventional military conducted fighting in Ukraine, he continued to play a seemingly indispensable role for the Russian offensive, and appeared to suffer no retaliation from Putin over his criticism of the President’s top generals.
Media reports at times suggested Prigozhin’s influence on Putin was growing, and that he was after a prominent political post. But analysts warned against overestimating his influence with Putin.
Mark Galeotti of University College, London, who specialises in Russian security affairs, said of Prigozhin on his podcast In Moscow’s Shadows: “He’s not one of Putin’s close figures or a confidant.
“Prigozhin does what the Kremlin wants, and does very well for himself in the process. But that’s the thing – he is part of the staff, rather than part of the family.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel