RISHI Sunak has said he is prepared to make decisions “people may not like” to control inflation as he once again refused to accept recommendations for public sector pay rises.
UK Government ministers have suggested they could choose to ignore advice by independent review bodies to increase public sector pay as part of attempts to calm the rate of rising prices — an option the Prime Minister has refused to take off the table.
Sunak has set halving inflation by the end of the year as his top priority ahead of a likely general election in 2024.
But inflation has stayed stubbornly high, with the Consumer Prices Index (CPI) inflation remaining at 8.7% in May despite experts forecasting it would fall.
Speaking to broadcasters during a trip to Nottinghamshire on Monday, the Prime Minister argued that, with inflation “higher than we’d like”, it was important to “make the right and responsible decisions on things like public sector pay”.
He said further walkouts being planned by junior doctors were “very disappointing” and claimed this would “make it harder” to bring down NHS waiting lists – another of his five key pledges to the electorate.
Junior doctors in England are due to stage a five-day strike next month as their row with the Government over pay and staffing rumbles on.
Addressing the scheduled junior doctors’ industrial action, Sunak said: “It’s just going to make it harder to bring waiting lists down and I think people should recognise the economic context we’re in.
“I’m going to make the decisions that are the right ones for the country.
READ MORE: Police Scotland shares tweet backing Scottish independence
“That’s not always easy, people may not like that, but those are the right things for everybody that we get a grip of inflation.”
Earlier on Monday, social care minister Helen Whately refused to say whether the Government would accept pay review recommendations, saying only that it would “consider” any advice given.
On Sky News, the senior Conservative MP said she did not recognise a suggestion put to her that ministers had previously committed to abiding by the independent panels’ counsel, replying: “I don’t believe that is what we’ve always said.”
She added: “I can’t say here and now what the outcome of the whole process is going to be.
“We know we have a number one priority of bringing down inflation and actually the job in Government and of the Prime Minister is to make tough decisions.”
Pay review body recommendations are not legally binding on the Government and, although they are typically accepted, ministers can choose to reject or partially ignore the advice.
The UK Government defended last year’s below-inflation pay rises by saying it had followed the bodies’ advice.
Kate Bell, assistant general secretary of the Trades Union Congress (TUC), said any decision to ignore pay review body advice would be “driven by politics, not economics”.
She said public sector wages had fallen “well behind inflation” and that there had been a “15-year wage squeeze where wages haven’t kept up with inflation”.
“We had the Government, back in the winter when they were refusing to negotiate with NHS workers — eventually, of course, they did come to the table — relying very heavily on the pay review bodies, saying we had to take into account this independent process,” she told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme.
“It is a bit rich to hear them now saying, ‘Well, we’re going to overturn those independent recommendations’ when we haven’t even seen them be published yet.”
It comes as Citizens Advice Scotland reveal that demand for online advice on mortgages has skyrocketed, with the number of people searching for help concerning a lender trying to repossess a home increasing by 103% since May 2022.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel