A MAN suspected of rape has had his bid to halt the long-delayed extradition thrown out of court.
Nicholas Ross, who allegedly faked his own death to avoid prosecution, continued to deny his identity when he appeared at Edinburgh Sheriff Court on Monday.
The 35-year-old, who arrived at court wearing a legal gown, previously claimed in court to be an Irish orphan named Arthur Knight but a sheriff ruled last November that he is Nicholas Rossi.
Asked by the clerk of court if he was Nicholas Rossi, the accused replied “no”.
His lawyer, Mungo Bovey KC, then moved for the extradition hearing to be scrapped citing a recent decision to move Rossi to a prison south of the border so that English police can question him about an alleged rape there.
Mr Bovey argued it would be wrong to press ahead with the hearing then, potentially, set terms for Rossi’s extradition to the US based on his current medical condition before knowing whether he would be charged in England.
READ MORE: Prison guard suspended for alleged abuse of US fugitive, court told
He said should charges be brought and proven, then Rossi could end up serving a custodial sentence in England during which his health could deteriorate before being extradited under the terms set in Edinburgh when he was in better health.
Mr Bovey said: “In my submission we are in an awkward position by reason of a decision apparently made in the Crown Office.”
Advocate depute Alan Cameron argued the extradition hearing ought to continue, however, saying Mr Bovey’s argument rested on possibilities.
After a lengthy adjournment, sheriff Norman McFadyen decided the hearing should go ahead but added that the subject of Rossi being wanted for questioning in England being raised at its outset was “deeply unsatisfactory”.
Rossi was arrested and detained, while he was being treated for Covid-19 at the Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, in December 2021, in connection with an alleged rape in Utah.
It has been alleged Rossi faked his own death in 2020 and fled from the US to the UK to evade prosecution.
The hearing continues.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article