THE president of the SNP has hit out at what he called “misleading” reports around the party’s plan to send an envoy to Brussels in the wake of a General Election win.
At a special convention over the weekend, First Minister Humza Yousaf said the SNP would be making independence the explicit result of a vote for his party at the next General Election.
He said an SNP win in the next Westminster election would see preparations for independence begin, and his Government would seek negotiations on how to give “democratic effect” to the mandate with their UK equivalent.
READ MORE: Humza Yousaf in Brussels to meet with US and European stakeholders
As part of those preparations, Yousaf said there would be “a draft legal text on the withdrawal agreement, the drafting of an interim constitution, [and] the creation of a special envoy to Brussels because our case for independence is based on a Scotland in the European Union”.
He elaborated: “If we win the General Election, we will prepare the ground for Scotland to become an independent member state of the EU, by establishing an envoy position, a representative of the Scottish Government in Brussels.
"This position will be focussed on explaining the Scottish Government policy on independence to our fellow Europeans. We will reinforce to our European partners our commitment to a legal, constitutional democratic process.
"But we will also seek to enhance understanding that Scotland is an ancient nation, committed to the founding values of the EU, a country with much to gain from EU membership, but also much to offer as we navigate the challenges of the 21st century."
Reports in The Times, which were picked up by papers such as The Express, suggested that sources in the EU had “rebuffed” Yousaf’s proposals for an envoy.
“The EU as such deals only with the official governments of third countries,” one source told The Times, adding: “Of course we welcome the friendship of our Scottish friends and stand ready to engage with all parts of the UK within this new cycle of our relationship.”
The “official” government of a third country in this case would be the one in London.
However, that same Times report highlighted how, in 2022, Wales appointed former MEP Derek Vaughan to be its first Welsh Government Representative on Europe.
The Labour government in Cardiff said that Vaughan’s role would see him connect with the European Commission and MEPs to “promote the Welsh Government’s policy agenda in the EU” and “represent the Welsh Government in key European networks, such as the Conference of Peripheral Maritime Regions”.
As representation in Brussels (common across many sectors and by - as yet - non sovereign states ) not negotiation with Brussels is the clear and stated intention this @thetimes story is either woefully ill informed or deliberately misleading. Bad journalism in either case. https://t.co/HZCxpdtshA
— Michael Russell (@Feorlean) June 27, 2023
SNP president Michael Russell said that the “clear and stated intention” of Yousaf’s proposals for an envoy was common in Brussels and that reports suggesting the idea had been rebuffed from within Europe were “misleading”.
He wrote: “As representation in Brussels (common across many sectors and by – as yet – non-sovereign states) not negotiation with Brussels is the clear and stated intention this @thetimes story is either woefully ill-informed or deliberately misleading.
“Bad journalism in either case.”
The Times did also report that “senior figures with knowledge of how the EU works said that an envoy may be able to make the Scottish Government’s case to various individuals in Brussels”.
The row comes with Yousaf in Brussels to meet a range of stakeholders from the US and Europe, including Maros Sefcovic, the vice-president of the European Commission.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel