A CONSERVATIVE MP has doubled down on his comments after sparking outrage with a tweet which appeared to mock a woman’s mental health.
Brendan Clarke-Smith labelled political commentator Tan Smith a “vile internet troll” on Monday evening after she thanked a Samaritans volunteer for helping her at Glastonbury.
Smith, who goes by Supertanskiii on Twitter, said the volunteer’s intervention made “such a difference” as the festival can be a “battle of endurance” for those with ADHD.
But the MP for Bassetlaw caused outrage with a post saying: “Cares little for the welfare of others however when spouting her foul-mouthed bile on twitter. Excuse me for playing the world’s smallest violin.”
Vile Internet troll in personal issues shock. Cares little for the welfare of others however when spouting her foul-mouthed bile on twitter. Excuse me for playing the world’s smallest violin 🎻 https://t.co/1l8UYvuS8r
— Brendan Clarke-Smith MP (@Bren4Bassetlaw) June 26, 2023
Smith responded, saying the post had caused her “severe distress”, sharing that she had lost a friend to suicide and lives with PTSD.
In another tweet, she also called Clarke-Smith “incredibly foolish” and claimed he is about as popular “as an uninhibited w*nk in a public park”.
She tweeted: “It’s incredibly foolish to try to come for popular commentators with hundreds of thousands of followers and who have public opinion their side, when you’re about as popular as an uninhibited w*nk in a public park, Brendan.
“It’s all going a bit Raoul Moat. Are you ok, hun?”
Clark-Smith has not yet responded to Smith’s more recent post, but does appear to have doubled down on his comments as he has responded to many of those calling his behaviour into question.
Interesting moralistic take from a newspaper that thinks challenging foul-mouthed internet trolls on their hypocrisy is worse than mocking people who have died. https://t.co/yDklZY2aRt pic.twitter.com/Xy3BdJiOBG
— Brendan Clarke-Smith MP (@Bren4Bassetlaw) June 26, 2023
He responded directly to a Daily Mirror article detailing the backlash to his comments, tweeting: “Interesting moralistic take from a newspaper that thinks challenging foul-mouthed internet trolls on their hypocrisy is worse than mocking people who have died.
The opinion piece he was referencing was contrasting the reaction to the Titanic submersible and the deaths of those on board to that of hundreds of migrants lost while trying to cross the Mediterranean.
Clarke-Smith also responded to journalist Ben Kentish.
The Westminster editor for LBC said: “I have no idea who the original tweeter is or what they have/haven’t tweeted previously, but this is never, ever how you should respond to someone talking about their struggles with mental health. Especially if you’re an MP.”
The Tory MP replied: “You know full well about the tweeter’s track record Ben. Quit the Mother Teresa routine.”
The original post has still not been deleted despite generating hundreds of outraged responses.
The National has asked both Clarke-Smith and the Conservative Party for comment.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel