A BOARD set up to work on Scotland's pandemic preparations had to suspend meetings for over six months before the Covid-19 outbreak due to warnings over the impact of a No Deal Brexit, an inquiry has heard.
Gillian Russell, a senior civil servant, told the UK Covid-19 Inquiry that the Scottish Government Pandemic Flu Preparedness Board (PFPB) made “disappointing” progress on its plans prior to the pandemic.
Russell was the director of safer communities in Scotland between 2015 and 2020.
READ MORE: Scottish constituencies to change at next election - see how you're affected
The inquiry heard the board was commissioned in the summer of 2017 by then deputy first minister John Swinney, who is due to give evidence to the inquiry on Thursday.
The group was formed “to lead on Scotland’s interests at UK level and further develop preparedness in Scotland”.
The discussion came after Kate Blackwell KC raised the subject of the Scottish Government’s simulation of a flu pandemic in 2016 named Operation Silver Swan, and a series of recommendations made after the exercise to improve the nation’s readiness to deal with a pandemic.
She told the inquiry a number of meetings were subsequently held by health officials to review progress on the delivery of those recommendations, as well as further calls for improvements made following another UK-wide pandemic rehearsal called Operation Cygnus one year later.
Blackwell pointed out many of the recommendations had still not been fully implemented by June 2019, however, and went on to ask Russell why minutes of a resilience team meeting held that month to review progress stated work to deliver them had been “paused”.
Russell replied: “In October 2018 we were presented with the Yellowhammer planning assumptions for a no-deal Brexit and they were significantly challenging.
“A decision was taken that priority should be given to working through how we would mitigate the significant risks that would immediately crystalise on a no-deal Brexit.
“That took up a huge amount of strategic capacity across many parts of Scottish Government, including the resilience co-ordination of a lot of that work.”
READ MORE: Senior SNP MP Stewart Hosie to stand down at General Election
Turning to the formation of the PFPB to oversee the work, Blackwell went on to ask Russell why it appeared the group initially met every two months then stopped meeting altogether between November 2018 and June 2019.
Russell again cited behind-the-scenes planning for leaving the EU as the reason the group failed to convene. “That was No Deal Brexit”, she said.
Asked if there had also been a problem with resources, Russell replied: “There’s a finite resource in Government of people with certain skills and expertise.”
She went on to explain that employees with expertise on subjects such as drug supplies would have been involved in pandemic preparedness, but had to be tasked to consider the effect a No Deal Brexit would have on supplies instead.
“There was a lot of work across Government to try to mitigate and understand those risks,” she said.
Noting some outstanding work of pandemic preparedness was then later described in documents as being dealt with under the term “business as usual”, Blackwell asked: “It was a disappointing response, wasn’t it, to the recommendations from both Silver Swan and Cygnus?”
Russell replied: “It was disappointing but other factors came into play.”
Meanwhile, it had been widely reported that Scotland’s former chief medical officer would give evidence to the inquiry on Wednesday.
But Dr Catherine Calderwood, who quit her role after breaching her own lockdown rules by travelling to her second home during the first lockdown, did not appear for questioning.
No explanation was provided for her absence but it is understood she will now be called later in the inquiry to give her evidence.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here