AN artificial sweetener used in Diet Coke, Coke Zero and Pepsi Max is set to be named a carcinogen next month, declaring the ingredient a potential cancer risk to humans.
Aspartame will be listed as “possibly carcinogenic to humans” in the World Health Organisation’s reclassification, insiders have claimed.
The change, made by the WHO’s International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), will come in to effect next month.
The IARC ruling will declare the sweetener a potential hazard, but it does not take into account how much a person can safely consume.
That advice comes from a separate branch known as JEFCA (The Joint WHO and Food and Agriculture Organisation’s Expert Committee on Food Additives).
The JECFA has said aspartame is safe to consume with accepted daily limits since 1981, with an adult weighing 60kg needing to regularly drink between 12 and 36 cans of the drink a day before becoming at risk.
Aspartame is an artificial sweetener which was first developed in the 1960’s.
It is roughly 200 times sweeter than sugar and is used in a wide variety of “diet” and “sugar-free” products.
As well as being used in Diet Coke, Coke Zero and Pepsi Max, it is also listed as an ingredient in Fanta, Lucozade and Dr Pepper.
The IARC also applies the “possibly carcinogenic” label to using aloe vera and eating pickled vegetables.
Reacting to the leaked reports, International Council of Beverages Associations (ICBA) executive director Kate Loatman commented: "While it appears IARC is now prepared to concede that aspartame presents no more of a hazard to consumers than using aloe vera, public health authorities should be deeply concerned that this leaked opinion contradicts decades of high-quality scientific evidence and could needlessly mislead consumers into consuming more sugar rather than choosing safe no- and low-sugar options - all on the basis of low-quality studies.
“Even IARC agrees it is not the appropriate authority to undertake risk assessment based on actual consumption and that it 'does not make health recommendations.'
“We remain confident in the safety of aspartame given the overwhelming weight of scientific evidence and positive safety determinations by food safety authorities in more than 90 countries around the world.
“We, therefore, welcome the broader, more comprehensive food safety review underway by the WHO and the UN Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) Joint Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA)."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel