ABERDEEN Independence Movement (AIM) has been successful in engaging young people and fostering a youthful group.
Recently, three executive members of AIM had the opportunity to speak to the Believe in Scotland (BIS) steering committee on this topic. In this article, we will explore the strategies employed by AIM to attract and empower young voices, as well as the challenges they face in the process.
One of the significant advantages AIM possesses is the presence of two universities in Aberdeen and a population below the average age of Scotland nationwide. With these factors at play, it would be remiss not to have young people actively involved in the movement.
However, AIM does not merely have young people involved; we have positioned young people at the centre of our group. This deliberate approach was formulated prior to AIM’s launch in 2018.
During our pre-launch phase, two of our four co-founders – Danny Forbes and myself – spent months designing the group and outlining our objectives.
We strongly believed that we should reflect the demographics of the population we represent. Promoting new and young voices was a key aspect of our mission.
To ensure these principles were ingrained from the outset, we formed a steering committee consisting of 12 individuals.
Crucially, three members of the steering group were under the age of 25, and they were given equal opportunity and empowered to contribute alongside older counterparts during our deliberations.
Josh Mennie and Theo Forbes are now “old hands” in AIM who have always offered mentorship not just to our younger members, but to all members showing an interest.
Many organisations claim to desire the involvement of young people but often their approach is focused on having young individuals show up and comply with instructions.
This approach has of course proven itself to be counterproductive and quickly alienates young people who should not be treated as mere props for photographs, but be empowered by being truly listened to when advocating their individual perspectives and accepting their time constraints are crucial.
Long, drawn-out meetings are also not conducive to engaging young individuals, who typically have busy schedules.
AIM understands this and ensures that meetings never exceed an hour in duration – and meetings are called only when needed.
When discussing AIM, I often emphasise that we are a youth-led group with a few experienced individuals – including myself – in supporting roles.
Older members have an important role to play in offering mentorship and filling in gaps that may arise due to the fluctuating commitment levels of younger members.
Acknowledging and embracing the transient nature of young people’s involvement has shown to be essential for maintaining engagement.
Unfortunately, it is not uncommon to witness patronising attitudes towards young activists, even if it is unintentional.
Such behaviour can be detrimental and discourages young people from participating. To attract and retain young individuals, it is imperative to listen to suggestions, respect their opinions and empower them to take the lead, especially on their own ideas.
Furthermore, it is crucial for older activists to understand that the reasons motivating young people to support independence may differ significantly from their own. Recognising and appreciating the diverse perspectives within the movement is vital for fostering unity.
It is encouraging to see the steps being taken by BIS in establishing a youth-led organisation.
During a recent BIS steering group meeting, representatives from AIM – Luke, Niamh and Cameron – took the floor and engaged in productive discussions with Gordon MacIntyre-Kemp and the steering group.
This kind of dialogue ensures that the resulting organisation will be truly youth-led, with the support and empowerment of older members rather than being led by them.
AIM recognises the invaluable contributions that young people bring to the movement and strives to actively involve and motivate them.
Regardless of age, every voice – be it 16 or 80 – deserves to be heard, and it is AIM’s responsibility to listen, embrace and empower the diverse range of young voices within our movement.
By doing so, we unlock the untapped potential of our youth and create a stronger, more inclusive movement for independence.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel