A CHARITY boss has claimed Immigration Minister Robert Jenrick told staff at an asylum reception centre to paint over wall art meant to be “welcoming” for children.
CEO of the Refugee Council, Enver Solomon, told the i Paper that Jenrick gave the order on the same visit to the Kent asylum intake unit earlier this year in which he also told workers to take down colourful welcome signs.
Apparently, this was to make clear how the centre wasn’t a “welcome centre” but a “law enforcement environment”.
Recounting the minister’s visit, Solomon said: “The Immigration Minister said pictures of cartoons and animals must be removed and that staff should make sure they are painted over, as they give an impression of welcoming, which Jenrick didn’t want to show.
“This demonstrates that the hostile environment has become so entrenched, that today we have lost sight of humanity.”
READ MORE: Tory Johnny Mercer suggests food bank use is a choice
It comes after the House of Lords demanded a string of changes to the Illegal Migration Bill on Monday including strict time limits on the detention of children and pregnant women, protections for victims of modern slavery and safeguards for the care of unaccompanied youngsters.
The bill aims to ensure those who arrive in the UK without permission will be detained and promptly removed, either to their home country or a third country.
Provisional figures showed more than 11,000 migrants had so far made the Channel crossing this year, with a record for June of 3824.
A Home Office spokesman told i: “We do all we can to ensure children are safe, secure and supported as we urgently seek placements with a local authority.
“All children receive a welfare interview on their arrival at accommodation, which includes questions designed to identify potential indicators of trafficking or safeguarding issues.
“Our priority is to stop the boats and disrupt the people smugglers. The government has gone further by introducing legislation which will ensure that those people arriving in the UK illegally are detained and promptly removed to their country of origin or a safe third country.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel