AN SNP MP is calling for an end to bishops’ automatic right to sit in the House of Lords.
Tommy Sheppard – who represents Edinburgh East – will lead a debate in Westminster on the issue today.
The chair of the All-Party Parliamentary Humanist Group said that polls show that people in Scotland overwhelmingly want the bishops out of the "unelected" Lords
He added that bishops enjoy numerous privileges over ordinary peers, including advance consultation privileges on legislation, extra speaking rights in the chamber, and exemptions from the Code of Conduct.
26 bishops from the Church of England currently sit in the upper house.
Sheppard stressed that representatives of no other faith or belief group enjoy the same privileges and that the appointment of bishops to the unelected chamber is a “hangover from feudal times and [has] no place in a modern, pluralistic society”.
Sheppard said: “Bishops, appointed by the Church of England, to sit, speak and vote in Parliament, don’t represent the beliefs or faith groups of most citizens across the UK, and yet enjoy a place amongst other unelected Lords in an entirely undemocratic second chamber.
“The laws that keep in place their automatic right to sit in the unelected House of Lords are a hangover from feudal times and have no place in a modern, pluralistic society.
“Their presence is an insult to other religions and beliefs, and is against centuries of progressive development to separate church and state.
“Fundamentally though, as a whole, the House of Lords is an archaic institution and one that defies the notion the UK is a true democracy. Sadly though, with both Labour and the Tories having done nothing to reform it, Scotland is stuck with unelected representatives presiding over many of our laws.
“The entire Westminster system is fundamentally broken, and it has become increasingly clear that the only way we can escape it, and the undemocratic House of Lords forever, is with the full powers of independence.”
A spokesperson for the Church of England said bishops who serve in the House of Lords provide “an independent, non-partisan voice in parliamentary debates, bringing an ethical and spiritual perspective that is also informed by their roles as key figures in local civil society”.
They added: “Their presence in Parliament not only reflects our constitutional arrangement, with an established church, but also provides an ethical and faith perspective on the business of the day, informed by the Church’s role as a Christian presence in all communities of England.
“They do not sit as a party, so have no whip or party-line to follow. Alongside their roles as bishops in the dioceses they serve, they play a full and constructive role in the House of Lords in its role of scrutinising and helping to improve legislation.
“They have been active in recent years on areas as diverse as curbing gambling-related harms; helping children and families in poverty; the needs of women in prison; preserving free speech and – as we see this week – questions around combatting people-smuggling and helping refugees.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel