SCOTTISH rugby fans have reacted with fury over the appointment of ex-Tory leader Ruth Davidson to the union's board, with some vowing to never go to a game at Murrayfield again.
Davidson – who headed up the Scottish Tories between 2011 and 2019 – will hold the role of non-executive director, with the body also announcing the appointment of businessman Mike Soutar to the same position.
But the move has been met with rage from lifelong fans who have branded Scottish Rugby Union (SRU) a "disgrace" and "outrageous".
Many have said they will boycott games or hand their season ticket back over the appointment of a "divisive and mistrusted individual".
READ MORE: Scottish independence report by top experts to launch next week
Others have even gone as far as to say they will support other countries they have links with instead.
SNP MP Gavin Newlands, who is a big rugby fan, said on social media: "I'm not sure what the upside of this appointment is, but it must be huge if it's to outweigh the horrendous PR and ill-feeling it has generated.
"It also tends to confirm a stereotype that I've spent years trying to convince folk was massively exaggerated."
Newlands later said he was referring to the assumption that "rugby is for posh folk and full of Tories" after being branded "obtuse" by another fan.
I'm not sure what the upside of this appointment is, but it must be huge if it's to outweigh the horrendous PR and ill-feeling it has generated.
— Gavin Newlands MP 🏴🇺🇦 (@GavNewlandsSNP) July 6, 2023
It also tends to confirm a stereotype that I've spent years trying to convince folk was massively exaggerated. https://t.co/FaFcFDwgZm
Twitter user Robert-W-Boyd said he had supported Scotland since he was a boy but was now considering switching his allegiance to Wales on the back of the appointment.
He said: "Utterly appalling decision on giving Davidson a post at your organization, I have supported Scotland since I was a child, but lucky enough while I was born in Kilmarnock I do have a Welsh mother."
Pro-independence Twitter account MSM Monitor has also highlighted controversial comments Davidson has made, such when she accused the SNP of being "anti-English".
Another fan, with the handle @MitchMacV, said he wanted his season ticket refunded.
Davidson recently claimed the SNP was anti-English. Presumably this includes members of the party and people who vote for the party. Does Scottish Rugby think these comments acceptable? pic.twitter.com/nARVz12GwT
— MSM Monitor (@msm_monitor) July 6, 2023
He posted: "Shocking decision particularly in the case of Ruth Davidson. I’ll be looking for a refund on our upcoming summer test tickets. Completely blinkered appointments and without a single thought to the opinions of many members of the paying public and fans (remember them?)."
@Davidkidd_58 added: "I’m absolutely gobsmacked! A divisive & mistrusted individual with no business, motivational or top level sport experience. What on Earth can she bring to improve Scottish Rugby?"
READ MORE: Question Time: Johnny Mercer slammed by audience member
Scottish Rugby cited Baroness Davidson of Lundin Links’s experience running a consultancy business, as a speaker on leadership and diversity, and on voluntary and charitable boards.
The body said Davidson would bring a “breadth of experience” to the board.
Utterly appalling decision on giving Davidson a post at your organization, i have supported Scotland since i was a child, but lucky enough while i was born in Kilmarnock i do have a Welsh mother.
— Robert-W-Boyd 🏴🇪🇺 🇵🇸 ⛤ (@Rab_Boyd27) July 7, 2023
But @SandraMcLauchl3 was one of many who said the move made her angry and that she would be considering her membership going forward.
She said: "This actually makes me both sick and angry and seriously considering my membership! This is a terrible decision and one I am sure most members will be annoyed with."
The National has approached the SRU for comment.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel