A SCOTTISH Tory MP who criticised windfall taxes on oil and gas firms did not declare that his wife has more than £50,000 worth of shares in BP, it has been revealed.
David Duguid, MP for Banff and Buchan, has spoken against windfall taxes on companies such as BP four times in parliament since the beginning of 2022.
The former junior minister in the Scotland Office has also voted against proposals to examine the impact of increasing windfall taxes, which would impact the dividends paid to shareholders.
The Guardian reports that an analysis of BP’s shareholder register suggests Duguid moved his shares into his wife’s name five years before he became an MP.
READ MORE: Firm who donated to Tories are now Scottish Labour's biggest backer
Duguid’s spouse has more than 11,000 shares and would have received more than £2000 last year in dividends, the newspaper reports.
Parliamentary rules require MPs to declare the financial interests of family members and spouses where there could be considered a conflict of interest.
However, Duguid has never publicly disclosed his wife’s financial interest in the House of Commons register.
A spokesperson for Duguid insisted the MP had abided by the rules.
Since the start of 2022, the Tory MP has declared interest in BP in two debates in parliament, but only referencing his prior employment of 25 years in the oil and gas industry, 10 of which were spent working for BP.
And, despite his involvement with energy policy during his time in the Scotland Office, Duguid’s wife’s shares were not contained in the list of ministers’ interests published by the Cabinet Office.
Duguid was a junior minister in the Scotland Office under Boris Johnson between June 2020 and September 2021, and again, briefly, under Liz Truss in October 2022.
During his time as a minister, Duguid met nine times with lobbyists from the oil and gas trade association Oil and Gas UK, now known as Offshore Energies UK (OEUK).
READ MORE: I tried Twitter's rival app Threads - here's how it went
OEUK’s members include BP, and it has recently argued against an increase in the windfall tax on energy producers. He also worked on the North Sea Transition Deal, an agreement between the UK Government and the oil and gas industry, to work together to meet net zero commitments by 2050.
Duguid was in attendance at the August 2021 opening of OEUK’s new offices in Aberdeen.
Under the current system, MPs are required to declare any holdings in a company over £70,000.
For ministers, all interests held by themselves, their spouses and family members that could give rise to a conflict must be provided to the department’s permanent secretary.
This includes shareholdings under the parliamentary threshold of £70,000, with a decision then made by the independent adviser on ministers' interests which “relevant” interests are published publicly.
The ministerial code states that ministers “must scrupulously avoid any danger of an actual or perceived conflict of interest between their ministerial position and their private financial interests”
BP’s shareholder register shows that Duguid stopped being a shareholder in BP in November 2012.
READ MORE: Angus MacNeil and Brendan O'Hara bust-up 'not evidence of party split'
On the same day, his wife joined the company’s register of members.
Duguid was first elected to the Banff and Buchan seat in 2017. He is also the vice-chair of the British offshore oil and gas industry all-party parliamentary group, supported by OEUK.
He previously claimed plans by Labour to ban new oil and gas drilling were “based on ideology”.
A spokesperson for Duguid said: “Mr Duguid followed the prevailing rules for reporting relevant financial interests.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel