SCOTLAND’S information watchdog has ordered ministers to hand over any analysis done into re-joining the EU after independence.
The SNP have repeatedly stated their commitment for Scotland to join the bloc again if the country ever leaves the UK.
However, it is unclear how long accession could take in the event of a Yes vote. Previously, Dr Kirsty Hughes estimated it could take four to five years after independence to join the bloc.
A Freedom of Information (FoI) request by a member of the public was initially refused, but an appeal to Darren Fitzhenry – the country’s information commissioner – has forced ministers to divulge any analysis they hold.
READ MORE: Alex Salmond to host new Scottish current affairs programme
Writing in a decision posted on the commissioner’s website, he said ministers “failed to comply” with part of FoI legislation, adding: “The commissioner therefore requires the ministers to provide the applicant with the information they have wrongly withheld, by August 17, 2023.”
The Scottish Government argued that keeping the document secret would help the development of “high-quality policy- and decision-making”.
He added: “They contended that ministers and officials needed to be able to consider all available options and to debate those rigorously to fully understand their possible implications.
“The ministers argued that premature disclosure of these options would seriously undermine internal debate on the various routes Scotland could take to join the EU, which in turn would undermine the quality of the policy-making process. If this occurred, the ministers contended, it would not be in the public interest.”
The information commissioner, however, rejected the arguments.
He said: “The commissioner agrees that there is a substantial public interest in the disclosure of information that would contribute to transparency and accountability, allowing scrutiny of matters being considered in the process of policy formulation and development.
“This would assist the public in understanding the very important policy issues under consideration and the likely consequences of any decisions to be taken, which are matters of legitimate public debate.
“In all the circumstances of this case, he is satisfied that the public interest in maintaining the exemption is outweighed by the public interest in disclosing the information.
“There is a strong public interest in allowing the public to understand the various options open to an independent Scotland, in relation to re-joining the EU and in understanding how long each option might take.”
READ MORE: Wee Ginger Dug: BBC's presenter scandal shows its double standards over SNP
Both the Government and the applicant have 42 days to appeal against the decision, but should they fail to provide the necessary information, the Scottish Government could be held in contempt of court.
“If the ministers fail to comply with this decision, the commissioner has the right to certify to the Court of Session the ministers have failed to comply,” the decision said.
“The court has the right to inquire into the matter and may deal with the ministers as if they had committed a contempt of court.”
A Scottish Government spokesperson said: “Scottish ministers note this decision from the Scottish Information Commissioner and will now consider their response.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel