HUMZA Yousaf has urged Anas Sarwar to tell Keir Starmer to “do another U-turn” and commit to scrapping the two-child benefit cap.
The First Minister weighed in on the row over the Conservatives' benefit cap, introduced by then-chancellor George Osborne in 2017, after the UK Labour leader said he was “not changing that policy” if the party wins the next General Election.
Earlier Sarwar made a ridiculous excuse for Starmer’s U-turn by claiming changing the policy would risk a repeat of the disastrous Liz Truss mini-budget and “spook the markets”.
READ MORE: Labour mayor Jamie Driscoll QUITS party and lashes out at Keir Starmer
Starmer previously pledged to scrap the policy during the race to become Labour leader.
It comes as Plaid Cymru urged Welsh First Minister Mark Drakeford to call out Starmer on the “cruel” benefit cap.
The policy has been repeatedly blamed for pushing families into poverty, with senior Scottish Labour MSPs demanding that Starmer change his position.
Now, the First Minister (pictured above) has joined in on calls for Labour to scrap the two-child limit.
He said: “The two-child limit is cruel and should be binned.
"If @AnasSarwar truly has any influence with UK Labour, he will tell Starmer to do another U-turn & scrap it.
“Retaining the two-child limit is a deliberate policy choice to keep children in poverty.”
READ MORE: Yvette Cooper: Barges could be used by Labour to house asylum seekers
Earlier, SNP MSP Collette Stevenson said Labour “can never justify” U-turning to support a “cruel policy” that is pushing families and children into poverty.
“Their current chaotic policy decision-making has left their own members criticising this recent U-turn,” she said.
In Wales, Plaid Cymru leader Rhun ap Iorwerth said that Starmer had chosen to adopt a “cruel Tory policy” and urged Drakeford (below) to speak out against it.
“If the First Minister truly wants to fix child poverty, he will urge Starmer to reconsider today,” he added.
“Let’s prioritise children’s wellbeing over political expediency.”
On Monday, Sarwar claimed there were fears of repeating the financial mismanagement imposed by Truss and then-chancellor Kwasi Kwarteng, which saw inflation rise, the pound collapse and a hike to mortgage interest rates.
READ MORE: Keir Starmer faces fierce criticism following 'painful' BBC interview
He insisted that scrapping the controversial benefit limit on parents with more than two children could “spook the markets”.
"We are not going to be able to fix everything straight away and we’re not going to be able to do everything that we want to do or need to do because of the state of that financial crisis,” Sarwar said.
On Monday, shadow home secretary Yvette Cooper said that the party must be “clear about what we can fund” as controversy over Starmer’s comments grew.
Cooper said that Labour initially opposed the policy when it was introduced, but added: “And we have pointed out a whole series of different things that the Conservatives have done that are damaging, but we’ve also been really clear that anything that we say has got to be funded.”
We previously told how Scottish Labour’s deputy leader Jackie Baillie compared the two-child benefit cap to China’s “abhorrent” one-child policy during a poverty debate in Holyrood in 2018.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel