TWITTER users have rebranded Sir Keir Starmer as Sir Kid Starver – as a Labour civil war erupts over the two-child benefit cap.
Many have found his new nickname bares similarities to Margaret Thatcher’s name from opponents – “Thatcher, the milk snatcher”, coined for taking away free milk from school pupils.
So, why is Starmer being called a kid starver?
The Labour leader has decided to U-turn on his pledge to scrap the two-child benefit cap. It prevents parents from claiming child tax credit or Universal Credit for any third or subsequent child born after April 2017.
This has led to some of his own cohort of Scottish MSPs, such as Pam Duncan-Glancy, saying he is endorsing a policy that “puts and keeps people in poverty”.
Dame Jackie Baille has previously said that it is reminiscent of China’s one-child policy – adding that it was scrapped, and so “maybe now the Tories can bring themselves to follow China’s example”.
READ MORE: Humza Yousaf calls for Labour U-turn on two-child benefit cap row
Anas Sarwar, the Scottish Labour leader, defended Starmer's decision because the party did not want to “spook the markets” into a Truss-style market meltdown.
Aaron Bastani wrote on Twitter: "It’s hard to overstate how insane it is to keep the two child cap on benefits for Labour. 250k kids could be taken out of poverty for £1.3 billion."
‘Sir Kid Starver’ is trending on Twitter.
— Aaron Bastani (@AaronBastani) July 17, 2023
It’s hard to overstate how insane it is to keep the two child cap on benefits for Labour. 250k kids could be taken out of poverty for £1.3 billion.
Last year we gave Ukraine £2.3 billion in weapons. pic.twitter.com/udCARKVxoz
The Sun quoted an off-the-record shadow minister saying: “This was a political pothole that has suddenly turned into a massive chasm – how are we in a sh*tty position where we’re having to defend a sh*tty Tory policy?”
“Sir Kid Starver” is now the number 4 trending topic on Twitter.
— Owen Jones (@OwenJones84) July 17, 2023
It’s in danger of sticking. https://t.co/Eal6Cesoqy
The policy was introduced by George Osborne and has caused controversy ever since.
Starmer’s deputy leader Angela Rayner called it “inhumane” and the leader of the Opposition himself called for it to be scrapped.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel