A woman jailed for illegally obtaining abortion tablets to end her pregnancy during lockdown has won her Court of Appeal bid to reduce her sentence and will be released from prison.
Carla Foster, 45, was handed a 28-month extended sentence after she admitted illegally procuring her own abortion when she was between 32 and 34 weeks pregnant.
Sentencing her at Stoke-on-Trent Crown Court last month, Justice Pepperall said Foster would serve half her term in custody and the remainder on licence after her release.
But at the Court of Appeal in London on Tuesday, three judges reduced her prison sentence.
Dame Victoria Sharp, sitting with Lord Justice Holroyde and Justice Lambert, said Foster’s sentence would be reduced to 14 months and that it should be suspended.
READ MORE: Petition aims to stop DLC's 'playground' plans for Taymouth Castle
She said: “This is a very sad case, not least because of the length of the gestation when the offence was committed.
“It is a case that calls for compassion, not punishment, and where no useful purpose is served by detaining Ms Foster in custody.”
Dame Victoria added that there was “exceptionally strong mitigation” in Foster’s case and that she should be released from prison “immediately”.
Foster appeared for the hearing via video-link from Foston Hall Prison, wearing glasses and a dark blue top with flowers on the shoulders.
At her sentencing, the court heard she was sent the drugs by the British Pregnancy Advisory Service (BPAS) after she called them during lockdown in 2020 and lied about how far along in her pregnancy she was.
But during her appeal, her barrister Barry White said there was a lack of “vital” reports into Foster’s mental health at the time of the offence and that “the obvious impact of the pandemic added to Foster’s already anxious state of mind”.
The Court of Appeal was told that the prison in which Foster has spent 35 days has refused to allow her any form of communication with her three children, one of whom is autistic.
White also said Foster had voluntarily brought her actions to the attention of the police, adding: “Had she not done that, it is highly unlikely that she would have ever been prosecuted.”
Foster was initially charged with child destruction and pleaded not guilty, before admitting an alternative charge of administering drugs or using instruments to procure abortion.
READ MORE: SNP MSP Elena Whitham apologises after WhatsApp message leak
White said she was given 20% credit for her guilty plea to the second charge but could have been given the standard one third.
Robert Price, for the Crown Prosecution Service, said the original sentence was not “manifestly excessive”.
He added: “The judge correctly made allowances for mitigating factors in this unusually sensitive case.”
As well as the 14-month suspended prison sentence, Foster will also have to complete up to 50 days of activity.
Following the Court of Appeal’s decision, BPAS chief executive Clare Murphy said: “We echo the judges’ statements that this is a case that calls for compassion, not punishment, and are delighted with the decision to release Carla Foster from prison.
“The Court of Appeal has today recognised that this cruel, antiquated law does not reflect the values of society today.
“Now is the time to reform abortion law so that no more women are unjustly criminalised for taking desperate actions at a desperate time in their lives.
“Two women accused of illegally ending their own pregnancies are currently awaiting trial.
“We urge Parliament to take action and decriminalise abortion as a matter of urgency so that no more women have to endure the threat of prosecution and imprisonment.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel