THE two-child benefit cap has affected more than 80,000 children in Scotland in the last year, research commissioned by the SNP has found.
Analysis by the House of Commons Library also determined that an additional 20,000 children in Scotland were placed into poverty as a result of the benefits cap.
The news comes as Keir Starmer faces pressure to commit to scrapping the two-child benefit cap if his Labour party win power.
Starmer's stance on the policy has prompted outrage from within and outwith his own party, with Scottish Labour MSPs lining up to condemn it.
However, the group's leadership, Anas Sarwar and Jackie Baillie, have tried to play both sides, insisting both that the policy is "heinous" and that Starmer is right to keep it in place due to economic concerns.
The research for the SNP used the policy simulation tool UKMOD to estimate the effect of the policy since 2017.
If the policy were to be removed, about 30,000 fewer people would be in poverty in Scotland, including 20,000 children.
In Scotland, during the 2022/23 financial year, a total of 80,936 children live in households where the two-child cap has reduced benefits.
READ MORE: SNP challenge Keir Starmer amid Labour 'meltdown' over two-child limit U-turn
It has been applied to a total of 32,616 children.
Since 2017, when the cap came into force, it has cost families in Scotland £341.3 million.
The research also showed families have seen the real terms value of benefits fall well behind inflation – with working-age benefits rising a cumulative 15.4% over the six years since the policy was introduced. CPI inflation was 24.5% over the same period.
SNP MP Kirsten Oswald said: “The cruel, Tory, two-child cap has been one of the leading causes of poverty in the UK – and if Keir Starmer continues to impose it, the pro-Brexit Labour Party will be directly responsible for pushing thousands of Scottish children into poverty. There must be an immediate U-turn.
“The SNP strongly opposes this shameful and punitive policy, which is undermining the Scottish Government’s efforts to reduce poverty in Scotland, and is plunging working families, disabled people and carers into destitution.”
She continued: “The SNP Government has taken more than 90,000 children out of poverty with progressive policies like the Scottish Child Payment and Best Start Grant – but for every step we take forward, damaging Westminster policies like the two-child cap are dragging us back again.
“With the pro-Brexit Labour Party becoming indistinguishable from the Tories, it’s clear Westminster is incapable of delivering the change Scotland needs.”
Meanwhile, Scottish Green MSP Ross Greer (above) argued for more powers on welfare to be devolved to Scotland.
He said: “Keir Starmer’s Labour wants to double down on the cruelty and chaos of the Tories.
“Whoever wins the next General Election, real change will only come if power is taken away from Westminster and put in the hands of Scotland’s Parliament.
“We would certainly abolish the two-child cap and rape clause without delay.
“This is an urgent test for every Labour MSP.
“Will they stand with us to protect the most vulnerable by calling for these powers to be devolved to Scotland?”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel