ALEX Salmond has said Humza Yousaf should step in to mitigate the impact of the two-child benefit cap in Scotland.
Research commissioned by the SNP found the measure originally brought in by ex-Tory chancellor George Osborne in 2017 has affected more than 80,000 children in Scotland in the last year.
The analysis by the House of Commons Library also determined that an additional 20,000 children in Scotland were placed into poverty as a result of the benefits cap.
Now former first minister Salmond has insisted it is down to Yousaf to “uphold the traditional Scottish values of community and compassion” by mitigating its effects.
He says this wouldn't represent the Scottish Parliament being used as a "sticking plaster" for damaging Westminster policies.
READ MORE: John Nicolson calls out BBC for 'bizarrely' worded SNP headline
The Scottish Child Payment has already been brought in by the Scottish Government which sees eligible families receive a weekly payment of £25 for every child under 16.
Last week, a director of the Institute for Fiscal Studies said Scottish welfare reforms represent a “really quite significant” change in the way low-income families were being supported by the state and this was "not really appreciated".
Back in 2014, Salmond’s Government struck a deal with the then Labour opposition to back his Scottish Government’s Budget which effectively ended the bedroom tax in Scotland by fully mitigating the impact of the welfare reform which affected almost 80,000 Scottish households.
Salmond, now leader of the Alba Party, has now urged the First Minister to do likewise again to effectively end the two-child benefit cap in Scotland.
He said: “This wouldn’t be about using the Scottish Parliament as a sticking plaster to protect Scots from the abhorrent policies of Westminster but rather a means of showing that there is a new administration in town that seeks to show the people of Scotland that when the Scottish Parliament makes decisions about their welfare they will always be better decisions than those made by Westminster.”
Labour have caused uproar this week after Keir Starmer confirmed on Sunday his party would not scrap the rule.
Labour MSPs Monica Lennon and Mercedes Villalba were among those in Labour who condemned the move, with the former suggesting party members should fight against Starmer’s agenda.
The Child Poverty Action Group in Scotland estimates the cost of abolishing the two-child limit across the UK would be £1.3 billion.
READ MORE: Iain Livingstone: SNP finance probe 'moved beyond initial reports'
That would lift 250,000 children out of poverty - up to 15,000 of them in Scotland - the group says.
The estimated cost of fully mitigating the policy in Scotland would be around £85m, the Alba Party says.
Salmond said the Scottish Government could pay for this by striking a deal with councils in Scotland to increase the funding received for discretionary housing payments.
He said: “The Scottish Government already provinces funding through discretionary housing payments - that is how we mitigated the unacceptable hardship of Westminster’s bedroom tax.
“If the Scottish Government added a further £85m in funding this would mean that, if you are affected by the two-child benefit cap, just like those that were affected by the bedroom tax, you could simply apply to your local authority for a discretionary housing payment and you should get one.
“If Scotland took this approach we wouldn’t need to wait for a new Scottish benefit to be created by Social Security Scotland and the two-child cap could be fully mitigated in Scotland with money in the pockets of hard pressed families by the end of August.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel