KEIR Starmer has been challenged on his claim Labour were “proud” to overturn the ban on LGBT people serving in the armed forced.
The Labour leader’s comments came after the Prime Minister made a public apology to LGBT servicemen and women who were dismissed from the military for their sexuality in the 20th century.
Rishi Sunak’s apology came as a result of a review carried out by Lord Etherton into the experience of LGBT veterans who served in the armed forces between 1967 and 2000.
Starmer said Labour had been “proud” to overturn the ban in January 2000 – but neglected to mention that decision had been taken after the European Court of Human Rights [ECHR] had in 1999 ruled Britain’s ban on gay men and women serving in the military was a breach of their right to privacy.
READ MORE: Stephen Flynn targets Labour in genius pre-PMQs stunt
He said: “Labour in government was proud to repeal the ban on LGBT+ people serving in our armed forces and today we strongly welcome this apology from the prime minister as a recognition of their historic mistreatment.”
When the Labour government was taken to the European court in the 90s by ex-servicemen and a former RAF nurse who had been sacked after their sexualities were investigated by the Ministry of Defence, Government lawyers attempted to defend the ban.
John Nicolson (above), the SNP MP for Ochil and South Perthshire, tweeted: “Fact check. Keir Starmer says that Labour was ‘proud’ to repeal the ban on LGBT people serving in the military.
“In reality the Labour government defended the ban on gay people serving. It was the European courts which overturned the ban. Talk about rewriting history…”
Announcing the Government’s change of policy in the Commons, then-defence secretary Geoffrey Hoon focused his statement on the duty placed on the government by the court ruling and concerns about the “operational effectiveness” of the armed forces.
Hoon said: “The ECHR ruling makes it clear that the existing policy in relation to homosexuality must change.
“As all personal behaviour will be regulated by the code of conduct with the object of maintaining the operational effectiveness of the three services, there is no longer a reason to deny homosexuals the opportunity of a career in the armed forces.
“Accordingly, we have decided that it is right that the existing ban should be lifted.
“As no primary or secondary legislation is required, with effect from today, homosexuality will no longer be a bar to service in Britain's armed forces.”
Challenged on whether he agreed that “homophobic bigotry” had no place in the military some months prior to that announcement, Hoon would not be drawn, replying: “I have made it clear that the Government—unlike, apparently, some opposition members—are determined to uphold the law, but that we will do so in a way consistent with the operational effectiveness of our armed forces.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel