BRITISH diplomats have been enraged after the European Union appeared to endorse the Argentine name for the Falkland Islands.
At a summit of EU chiefs with leaders from the Community of Latin American and Caribbean States (Celac), Brussels supported a declaration naming the archipelago off the coast of Argentina as Islas Malvinas.
Buenos Aires has hailed the declaration – which also referenced the English name for the islands – as a “diplomatic triumph”, reports The Guardian.
The concerns of UK diplomats were reportedly brushed off by an EU official, who told the Financial Times: “If they were in the EU perhaps they would have pushed back against it.”
The official added: “This was agreed by 27 member states and the Celac countries.
READ MORE: Falklands have as much right to self-determination as Scotland does
“We cannot issue a statement on their behalf.
“The UK is not part of the EU. They are upset by the use of the word Malvinas. If they were in the EU perhaps they would have pushed back against it.”
Leaders in Argentina, which claims the UK territory as its own, said it was the first time the EU had recognised their country’s position on the islands.
The declaration, backed by almost all Celac countries, said: “Regarding the question of sovereignty over the Islas Malvinas/Falkland Islands, the European Union took note of Celac’s historical position based on the importance of dialogue and respect for international law in the peaceful solution of disputes.”
Nicaragua did not sign the declaration because of concerns about its language in light of the war in Ukraine, The Guardian reported.
Peter Stano, a spokesperson for the European External Action Service – the EU’s diplomatic service – said: “The EU member states have not changed their views/positions concerning the Falklands/Malvinas Islands.
“The EU is not in a situation to express any position on the Falklands/Malvinas, as there has not been any council [of member states] discussion or decision on this matter.”
He added: “The EU does not take any position on such issues without a council mandate.”
Rishi Sunak criticised the EU for a “regrettable choice of words” over the Falkland Islands, Downing Street has said.
His official spokesman told reporters: “The Prime Minister’s view is that it would have been entirely unacceptable for the EU to question the Falkland Islanders’ right to decide their own future.
“To be clear, the Falkland Islands are British, that was the choice of the islanders themselves.
“The EU has rightly now clarified that their position on the Falklands has not changed after their regrettable choice of words.
“And just as a reminder, in the 2013 referendum, 99.8% of islanders voted to be part of the UK family. It’s a position supported by international law and the UN Charter which is binding on all UN members.
“And we will continue to defend the Falklands’ right to self-determination in all international forums and have called on the EU to respect the democratic rights of the Falkland Islands.”
He added: “The concern is any suggestion that EU states would recognise Argentina’s claims on the Falklands, which they have now clarified is incorrect.”
Britain went to war in the 1980s when Argentina, then a military dictatorship, attempted to wrest back control of the islands.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel