RECLAIM Party leader Laurence Fox was dealt a humbling blow as he lost his deposit in the by-election to replace Boris Johnson.
The former actor turned right-wing politician failed to achieve the number of votes needed to hold onto the £500 the party will have paid to contest the Uxbridge and South Ruislip election on Thursday.
Fox picked up just over 2% of the vote with just 714 votes – less than the 5% required to recoup the money put down to stand.
He was hoping to become Reclaim’s first elected MP. Andrew Bridgen, who was booted from the Tories after comparing the Covid vaccine drive with the Holocaust, became Reclaim’s first MP when he joined the party earlier this year.
READ MORE: Reclaim MP fails in 'nasty' bid to crack down on 'gender ideology' in schools
Despite predictions the Tories would lose three seats this week, the party managed to hold onto Uxbridge but lost Selby and Ainsty to Labour while the LibDems picked up Somerton and Frome.
Very pleased to come 4th and have beaten the @LibDems a long established party.
— Laurence Fox (@LozzaFox) July 21, 2023
Shows that promoting conservative values can win.
We are now in the mix. Mission accomplished.
Well done everyone for standing. Takes courage. Congratulations to Steve. Off for a nap. 💤 https://t.co/0Yl8ckMplW
Tory candidate Steve Tuckwell held the seat on a platform of fierce opposition to the Labour Mayor of London’s plans to extend the ultra-low emission zone (Ulez) to include the outskirts of London.
Currently, the Ulez is bounded by the North and South Circular roads but Sadiq Khan wants to extend it to include all of the city.
Senior Labour figures have said Khan’s policy was to blame for their defeat.
Tweeting the results, Fox said: “Very pleased to come fourth and have beaten the Lib Dems, a long established party.
“Shows that promoting conservative values can win. We are now in the mix. Mission accomplished. Well done everyone for standing. Takes courage. Congratulations to Steve [Tuckwell]. Off for a nap.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel