KEIR Starmer has claimed victory in the battle over Labour’s next manifesto – but faces criticism over the “chaotic” process from a key trade union.
Speaking at the conclusion of a weekend debate at the party’s national policy forum, a spokesperson for the Labour leader said the party’s policymaking body had endorsed Starmer’s plans for "no unfunded spending commitments".
But Unite, Britain's largest trade union and a key affiliate to the Labour Party, said it could not support the document in its entirety, accusing the party of watering down pledges on workers' rights.
Rows reportedly broke out at the talks in Nottingham over a push to set the national living wage at £15 per hour, a move said to be backed by Unison, and Starmer’s commitment to adhering to punishing Tory welfare policy.
A Labour spokesperson said: “Labour’s democratic policymaking body has endorsed Keir Starmer’s programme, his five missions for government, and the fiscal rules that he and Rachel Reeves have set out.
“This is a serious, credible and ambitious policy programme that lays the groundwork for an election-winning manifesto and a mission-driven Labour government that will build a better Britain.
“There are no unfunded spending commitments in the document.
“This weekend is another proof point that shows that Keir Starmer has changed the Labour Party and is ready to change the country in government built on the rock of economic responsibility and strong fiscal rules.”
In a statement, Unite said: “Unite was unable to back the document in full as it clearly crossed the union’s red lines including around workers’ rights in collective bargaining — an area which needs root-and-branch change, not just tinkering around the edges.
“The process in Nottingham was also chaotic with an attempt to push through changes to the policy document without first sharing them with conference participants, including Unite.
“As in any negotiation, you simply don’t sign up to something without all the detail and understanding the impact on our members and workers more widely.
“As the General Election draws nearer, Keir Starmer has to prove Labour will deliver for workers and we need clear policies on this.”
Starmer has won over his internal critics in the battle over keeping the two-child benefit cap, introduced by Tory former chancellor George Osborne during his austerity drive.
READ MORE: ‘I don’t eat sometimes’: Scottish parents describe impact of two-child benefit cap
The BBC reported the policy documents agreed at the forum would include a get-out clause for the shadow chancellor to axe any policies which do not meet her iron-clad fiscal rules.
It was reported trade unions walked out of the talks in frustration during Saturday's discussions.
Addressing the forum on Saturday, Starmer said the party needed to show “historic levels of effort, discipline and focus” ahead of a likely election next year.
He said: “We’ve got to ask ourselves seriously – are our priorities the priorities of working people?
“Or are they just baggage that shows them we don’t see the country through their eyes?”
He added: “‘Tough choices’ is not a soundbite. It is the day-to-day reality we will face if we win power – clearing up their [the Tories’] mess.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel