THE rift in Labour over transgender rights has widened further with Sir Keir Starmer stating he “does not agree” with the Scottish party over the issue.
Anas Sarwar has also been urged by opposition parties to “break his deafening silence” and clarify whether he still supports the SNP’s gender self-ID policy after the “screeching U-turn” by the UK Labour party.
In a reversal of a previous commitment, Labour announced it will not support self-identification for trans people if it wins the next General Election.
Scottish Labour, which voted in favour of the Gender Recognition Reform (GRR) bill, has moved to distance itself from this stance.
READ MORE: Ex-Better Together chief Blair McDougall in running to be Labour MP
Speaking during a phone-in on BBC Radio 5 Live, Starmer said that “we don’t think that self-identification is the right way forward” after “reflecting on what happened in Scotland”.
And when asked about Scottish Labour continuing to back de-medicalisation of the process, Starmer responded: “Yeah we don’t agree. We don’t think self-identification is the right way forward, we have reflected on what happened in Scotland.”
He went on: “So we’ve set out that we want to modernise the process, get rid of some of the indignities in the process, keep it a medical process.
“And we’ve always said, I’ve continued to say, and Sunday, when we completed our policy forum, allowed us to be clear that there should be safe places, safe spaces, for women, particularly in relation to violence against women and girls.”
Starmer was then quizzed on whether this stemmed from concerns that women are “likely to be disproportionately violent”.
“No, it’s more that biological women who have been subject to violence, women and girls, want a safe space where they can feel that they are properly supported and protected and this comes from the tales of survivors,” he said.
The Labour leader also said he did not think there were many cases of Isla Bryson – the rapist who sparked a row about where transgender prisoners should be held – but added: “I do think the principle of safe space is very important for women”.
Scottish Labour said earlier this week that it remains committed to the “de-medicalisation” of the process for trans people to obtain legal recognition in their preferred gender.
Paul O’Kane, the party’s social justice spokesman at Holyrood, said: “Labour is committed to modernising and reforming the outdated and intrusive Gender Recognition Act, as well as ensuring exemptions in the Equality Act are upheld.
“Scottish Labour continues to support the de-medicalisation of the process in Scotland.”
READ MORE: George Foulkes: 'UK is not a Union of equals and never was'
But Scottish Conservative deputy leader Meghan Gallacher said: “In the wake of UK Labour’s apparent screeching U-turn on gender self-ID policy, voters in Scotland are entitled to know if Anas Sarwar still supports the SNP’s reckless GRR Bill.
“Some Labour MSPs have doubled down on their support for it in response to Anneliese Dodds’ article, but there has been a deafening silence from their leader.
“Anas Sarwar blithely ignored the concerns of many that the bill would put women’s safety at risk when he forced his MSPs to vote for it – concerns that were soon vindicated by the Isla Bryson case.”
Gallacher said UK Labour seemed to accept they have got this policy “badly wrong” and had written to Sarwar to ask if he is “willing to admit the same”.
However the Scottish Greens have warned Sarwar’s party must not “throw trans rights under the bus” as part of Labour’s campaign to reach Downing Street.
Maggie Chapman, the party’s equality spokesperson, said: “Gender Recognition Reform was supported by the overwhelming majority of the Scottish Parliament, including most Labour MSPs. Self-identification is used around the world. To see Labour backtracking on it is very concerning and disappointing.
“And let us remember that the legislation passed in Scotland was about making the administrative process of getting a Gender Recognition Certificate that would allow the change of sex on a trans person’s birth certificate easier.
“It was not about medical transition or any other intervention. Such an administrative process must not continue to be medicalised.
“Ian Murray and Anas Sarwar must make clear exactly where they stand on the use of the anti-democratic Section 35 Order and on self-identification. Trans rights cannot be thrown under the bus as part of an internal Labour power struggle.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel