THE Scottish Government is “very confident” that it can legally spend money on preparations for independence, Humza Yousaf has said.
The First Minister also said that Scottish ministers had not had any contact with UK officials who have been tasked with probing his devolved administration’s spending in reserved areas.
The news comes after Simon Case, the UK’s most senior civil servant, told peers on the Lords Constitution Committee that he had officials working with Tory ministers looking at Scottish Government spending.
And Lucy Neville-Rolfe, a Cabinet Office minister, told the House of Lords that the UK Government would consider what sanctions could be laid out in the updated “Cabinet Manual” for devolved administrations whose work strays into reserved areas.
READ MORE: Stephen Flynn accuses top UK civil servant of 'partisan political agenda'
Speaking at the launch of a Scottish Government white paper on citizenship after independence, one of the pieces of work which is under fire from a Unionist opposition who label it “a blatant misuse of public money”, Yousaf said his government was “very confident” in the legality of its actions.
“We are very confident in the position that we have, the legality and the legal position which we have, to bring forward these papers, publish these papers, and do the work that we’re doing,” Yousaf said.
“You will have seen some comments from academics in the last 48 hours who are experts in the issue of devolution [saying] that this is very much something that is within the gift of the Scottish Government.”
Independence Minister Jamie Hepburn (below), who was also present at the launch, added: “On that point, Robert Hazell, who was co-author of the Cabinet Manual which this has all been predicated on in terms of being looked at, said yesterday that it would be odd that the democratic mandate which we have would be tread across.
“It would be odd that civil servants aren’t able to support the Scottish Government in the democratic mandate they have to pursue independence.”
Professor Hazell was the founder and first director of the Constitution Unit at University College London (UCL).
His opinion came on top of another from Scottish Government law officers. In an opinion from December 2019 and referenced in a Freedom of Information release from 2020, the unnamed law officers said that Scottish ministers “can lawfully undertake policy development work preparing proposals for independence and in calling for a transfer of power”.
READ MORE: Details for citizenship in an independent Scotland revealed in new white paper
In the wake of such expert opinion, Yousaf told journalists at the launch of the independence white paper that there were no concerns about the legality of such work.
He went on: “We’re very confident in our basis for producing these papers, as are the civil servants that have done an excellent amount of work on producing these papers. What I would say to our opposition in particular is I think it speaks volumes that you’re trying to shut down our positive case for independence.
“Where’s your positive case for maintaining the Union? If you truly believe that there’s a case to be made, a positive case to be made for your proposition, then make it.”
He added: “They know that we have a winning argument here so they’re trying to shut it down instead of making their own case.”
The Scottish Conservatives have raged against the production of such white papers, with the group's constitution spokesperson Donald Cameron claiming: “People across Scotland will be appalled that Humza Yousaf is focusing on yet another self-indulgent paper touting independence. It is the wrong priority at the worst possible time.
“This paper is not only a blatant misuse of public money and resources by the SNP, but it also demonstrates how out of touch they are with the public."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel