WORLD-FAMOUS climate activist Greta Thunberg has joined a protest against the UK Government’s reported plans to allow development of an oil field in Scottish waters.
While no decision has yet been issued on the Rosebank oil field, off Shetland, the Tories and UK regulators are widely expected to approve the development.
More than 500 million barrels of oil are expected to be taken from Rosebank during its lifetime, despite the UK Government’s own climate advisers saying that further fossil fuel development would be “utterly unacceptable”.
Keir Starmer’s Labour Party has also suggested it would honour any decision the Conservatives make on the oil field.
Thunberg, known around the world for sparking the Fridays for Future climate movement, joined a demonstration against any development outside Net Zero Secretary Grant Shapps’s (below) office on Friday.
The Swedish climate activist said that a decision to approve Rosebank would be “deliberately destructive”.
“How can the British government even consider pressing ahead with new drilling when we can see what the burning of fossil fuels is doing to the climate and to people?” Thunberg said.
“The extreme weather events being experienced around the world right now is just a taste of what's to come if we don't get off fossil fuels.
“Given everything that we know and can now see with our own eyes, approving Rosebank would be a deliberately destructive act.”
Thunberg also criticised the Norwegian government, which will profit from Rosebank as the major shareholder of the field’s operator, Equinor. Ithaca Energy, which is owned by the Israeli Delek Group, is also backing the Rosebank field.
Thunberg said: “Norway’s claim to be a climate leader is absurd while Equinor plans to open up new oil and gas projects, like Rosebank, around the world.”
READ MORE: Plans for 'world leading' carbon tax on Scotland's largest estates gains momentum
StopRosebank activist and writer Tori Tsui, speaking alongside Thunberg, said: “The damage we are seeing today is so immense that it is unthinkable that any government would want to send us further down this path.
“Rich, oil producing countries, like the UK and Norway, must lead and that leadership starts with putting an end to new oil and gas developments. There is no justification on earth for approving Rosebank.”
The International Energy Agency (IEA) and the United Nations, as well as scientists and campaigners, have warned there should be no new investment or production of oil and gas if the world hopes to reduce global temperatures or reach net zero targets by 2050.
The Scottish Government has been urged by Friends of the Earth (FoE) Scotland to speak out against Rosebank, while revealing the extent that the Norwegian state-owned firm has lobbied Scottish parliamentarians.
Figures compiled by FoE Scotland found that from after the 2021 Holyrood election until the end of 2022, Equinor met 13 times with MSPs, five of which were with government ministers.
Approval for the development of Rosebank had been expected before Westminster went into recess, but it was put on hold.
READ MORE: MSPs urged to oppose Rosebank after Anas Sarwar pledges to honour licence
Campaigners warn that, if approved, “the CO2 emissions from burning Rosebank's reserves would be equivalent to the annual CO2 emissions of 28 of the world's lowest income countries”.
Rosebank is the largest undeveloped oil field in the UK.
Lauren MacDonald, from the StopRosebank campaign, said: “There is nothing ‘proportionate and pragmatic’ about opening up new oil fields, to use Rishi Sunak’s words.
It’s an extreme position in the context of the climate crisis.
“When you add to this that Rosebank won’t lower UK fuel bills, as it’s mostly oil for export, and the fact that the public is effectively stumping up 90% of the costs of developing the field because of the huge subsidies the industry gets, Rosebank makes zero sense.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel