FORMER health secretary Matt Hancock has had his complaints over a series of articles published in the Daily Mirror rejected by IPSO.
Hancock complained over a series of pieces published in November and December of last year.
The articles included the allegations that Hancock:
- “Presided over PPE contracts being handed out to acquaintances of ministers and officials including his ex-pub landlord”, during the Covid pandemic.
- “Broke ministerial code by failing to declare he held shared in a family firm that won an NHS contract.”
- Was a “failed health secretary and cheating husband who broke the lockdown rules he wrote, doubled down on the lies he told, helped enrich his mates via the infamous VIP PPE lane, and couldn’t resist monetising the infamy he acquired as a result of his ineptitude at managing the pandemic”.
The complaints were filed under Clause 1 of the Editors’ Code (accuracy) but were all rejected.
Hancock (below) was forced to resign as health secretary after video footage of him emerged of him kissing aide Gina Coladangelo in a breach of coronavirus restrictions.
He has already announced that he will be standing down as an MP at the next General Election.
He now sits as an independent in the House of Commons having lost the Conservative Party whip following his appearance on ITV’s I’m A Celebrity Get Me Out of Here.
Hancock has served as the MP for West Suffolk since 2010.
He first complained about the articles in question on June 30 and the full IPSO ruling can be read HERE.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel