MORE than a million adults across the UK do not have access to a bank account, with the highest proportion in the south of Scotland, figures show.
People living in deprived areas are also more far likely to be “unbanked”, according to the latest report from the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA).
The issue of accessing to banking services has been in the spotlight following the row over elite financial institution Coutts closing of the account of former UKIP leader Nigel Farage.
But charities have highlighted how it is often the most vulnerable groups in society who are facing a struggle with financial exclusion because of not having proof of an address or a poor credit history.
According to the FCA report examining the financial lives of people in the UK in 2022, “unbanked” adults make up 2.1% of the UK population – which is defined as not having a current account with a bank, building society, credit union or e-money institution.
This adds up to around 1.1 million people, down from 1.3 million in 2017.
Groups most likely to be unbanked included Muslims at 10%, while the unemployed, those who are long term or temporarily sick, looking after the home, or carers and those with no educational qualifications each made up 7% of the total.
The report notes: “There were higher proportions of unbanked adults in southern Scotland (6%), outer London – west and north west (5%), Greater Manchester (4%), and the West Midlands (4%).
“There is also a strong link to deprivation, as 3.6% of adults in the most deprived areas of the UK are unbanked, compared with less than 0.6% in the least deprived areas.”
Around a quarter of those who are “unbanked” said they would like to have a current account, with just over half saying they did not want one and a further quarter saying they were unsure.
Matt Downie, chief executive at homeless charity Crisis, said that it could be almost impossible for people experiencing homelessness to access employment, apply for benefits or find somewhere to live without a bank account.
“This often leaves many people stuck in a cycle of homelessness that can be difficult to escape from,” he said. “Although all high street banks are legally required to provide accounts for everyone, their requests for proof of identification or an address can make it extremely challenging for people who are homeless.”
He added: “We know that a number of banks are working hard in partnership with homelessness organisations to improve access to bank accounts, including schemes that bypass the need for ID and fixed addresses.
“However we need all banks to follow suit with more urgency, so that people aren’t financially excluded and at greater risk of homelessness.”
Karolina Kaminska, integration service manager at the Scottish Refugee Council said having a bank account is a vital first step in becoming financially included and setting up a life in Scotland.
But she said many refugees faced barriers in accessing services, such as being able to provide the right documents to meet different criteria around identification and proof of address.
Other issues include language barriers, with banks not required to provide interpreters, and a lack of internet access or digital literacy with some banks now asking for applications to be started online.
“We know that banks can do better, as our integration advisors have seen examples of good practice over last few years,” she said.
“There is certainly a small number of banks that are clear champions in equality and financial inclusion but these are the exception rather than the rule.”
Sarah-Jayne Dunn, a spokesperson for Citizens Advice Scotland, said a poor credit history could lead to difficulties in opening a bank account, along with issue such as not having access to the internet.
“Problems in accessing bank accounts can impact on the receipt of benefits, and can also limit employment opportunities because many employers will only pay wages into a bank account.” she added.
“Access to a bank account also makes it easier for people to access affordable credit, housing, and lower utility payments – which leads to a healthier financial situation overall.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here