THE Tory government has been accused of a “complete betrayal” of Scotland’s whisky industry as new rules are set to come into force that will see each bottle taxed at 75%.
The Scotch Whisky Association said the 10.1% duty increase for whisky was a “hammer blow for distillers and consumers” – while other alcohols are also set to see significant take hikes.
First set out by then chancellor Rishi Sunak in 2021, the new system aims to encourage consumers to cut back by taxing all drinks based on their strength, rather than the previous categories of wine, beer, spirits, and ciders.
The now Prime Minister described the overhaul as “the most radical simplification of alcohol duties for over 140 years”, enabled by Britain’s exit from the EU.
READ MORE: Scottish whisky fest will serve up a dram on the road
At March’s Budget, Chancellor Jeremy Hunt also announced that the freeze to alcohol duty would end on August 1 and increase by inflation, at 10.1%.
The increase will see duty rise by 44p on a bottle of wine, which when combined with VAT will mean consumers will pay an extra 53p, according to the Wine and Spirit Trade Association (WSTA).
Duty on 18% cream sherry will go up from £2.98 to £3.85, with VAT adding up to an increase of more than £1 a bottle, while a bottle of port will go up by more than £1.50.
The total tax on a bottle of gin or vodka will go up by around 90p.
Chancellor Jeremy Hunt is cutting the duty charged on draught pints across the UK by 11p in August in a major boost for pubs and draught beer drinkers.
However the British Beer and Pub Association (BBPA) said brewers will pay 10.1% more tax on bottles and cans of beer from Tuesday, meaning tax will make up around 30% of the cost of a 500ml bottle.
Despite the draught freeze, the BBPA said the tax increase on packaged beer will add an extra £225 million of costs per year across the industry.
After calling the duty increases a “hammer blow”, Scotch Whisky Association director of strategy Graeme Littlejohn went on: “At a time when inflation has only just started to creep downwards, this tax increase will continue to fuel inflation and make it more difficult for the Scotch whisky industry to invest in growth and job creation in Scotland and across the UK supply chain.
“Rather than choosing to back an industry which the UK Government promised to support through the tax system, the Government has chosen to impose the largest duty increase in almost half a century, increasing the cost of every bottle of Scotch whisky sold in the UK by almost a pound and taking the tax burden on the average priced bottle to 75%.
“In a further blow, distillers will now face a further competitive disadvantage in pubs, restaurants and bars by being unfairly excluded from tax breaks available to beer and cider.”
Richard Lochhead (above), the SNP MSP for the Speyside area, said he was “strongly opposed to the Tory’s plans to hike duty on Scotch whisky”.
He went on: “These distillers are some of the biggest employers in Moray and the industry is vital to our economy. There are serious concerns within the local industry about the impact duty increases will have on future investment in our region.
“There’s no doubt this 10% increase in duty – the highest rise in 40 years – is a complete betrayal of one of Scotland’s most valued industries.
“Ahead of the 2019 General Election, we had the Tories announce to big fanfare their plans to ensure the tax system supported the Scotch whisky industry. That commitment has been abandoned and the average bottle of whisky will now be taxed at an astonishing 75%.
“As usual we get big promises from the Tories in the run up to an election. Those promises have been long forgotten and the Scotch whisky industry is once again being singled out to boost UK Treasury coffers.”
READ MORE: Whisky boss demands urgent meeting with Jeremy Hunt
WSTA chief executive Miles Beale said: “We are careering towards an extremely tough period for wine and spirit businesses with tax hikes and other costs, including a prolonged cost of living crisis for their consumers, persistently high inflation, especially for food and drink, and rocketing prices for glass, leaving little room for many businesses to turn a profit. Inevitably some won’t be able to stay afloat, with SMEs most at risk.
“Amongst all this pressure the Government has chosen to impose more inflationary misery on consumers on August 1, with the biggest single alcohol duty increase in almost 50 years.
“Ultimately, the Government’s new duty regime discriminates against premium spirits and wine more than other products.
“Wine from hotter countries, like new trade deal partner Australia, will be penalised most of all, because the grapes grown in hotter climates naturally produce higher alcohol wines.
“And, at the same time, you cannot reduce alcohol in wine like you can for some other products.
“Making wine isn’t an industrial process; reducing wine’s alcoholic content is limited, changes the product and is costly to carry out. Nor can the alcohol in full strength spirits be reduced for products such as gin, vodka and whisky where a minimum strength prescribed by law.
“In the end the Sunak-Hunt changes to wine duty will reduce consumer choice and push up prices.
“For spirits you can expect at least a £1 increase on a bottle of gin or vodka and a leap of £1 per bottle of wine when duty is increased by 20% (plus VAT).”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel