THE Prime Minister has backed a review of the Scottish Government’s work on independence insisting it is “right” for the probe to go ahead.
Rishi Sunak gave his support to an investigation currently being undertaken by Simon Case, the Cabinet Secretary and head of the UK Civil Service, on the Scottish Government’s spending on independence.
Case previously told the House of Lords Constitution Committee on July 18 that the UK Government is probing spending on independence and the role of Jamie Hepburn, the Minister for Independence, as well as the civil servants tasked with working with him.
READ MORE: The Tory donors with links to fossil fuel interests and climate denial
The row deepened last week when First Minister Humza Yousaf published the fifth independence whitepaper focusing on Scottish citizenship.
The publication sparked a furious response from Scottish Secretary Alister Jack, who accused Holyrood ministers of being “simply irresponsible” for using public funds and civil service resources on producing the document.
Case has already said that new guidance could be issued to civil servants working for the Holyrood administration within weeks.
Speaking to journalists in Aberdeenshire on Monday, Sunak said: “What’s right is that, as the head of the civil service, it’s Simon Case, the Cabinet Secretary, who conducts a review of that particular situation and I think it’s right that we let that continue.”
The PM said that the UK Government was “focused on delivering for the people of Scotland”, adding that ordinary Scots did not want to see “more constitutional wrangling at this moment in time”.
It comes after Jack alleged that the Scottish Government was putting its “obsession with independence ahead of pressing priorities in Scotland” in a letter to Yousaf last week.
The Scottish Secretary, who joined the PM on a visit to Shell’s St Fergus Gas Plant amid an announcement on oil and gas licences, said he stood by his previous remarks.
“I think taxpayer money should be spent on public services in Scotland, that’s where the focus should be,” Jack said.
READ MORE: SNP write to DLC over 'billionaires' playground' plans for Taymouth
“We’re very clear about that and Simon Case has said he’s looking into it, and he’s looking into it, but it is important that that doesn’t have any political interference.”
Jack said in his letter that the Scottish Government must “cease being distracted by independence” and work with Whitehall officials to “deliver for business and people in Scotland”, amid growing tensions between the UK and Scottish Government over independence spending and planning.
The FM has already made clear he is “confident in our position” in terms of the Scottish Government’s independence papers, saying that it “speaks volumes” that the SNP’s opponents are “trying to shut down the debate instead of bringing forward their proposals for maintaining the Union”.
The spokesman for the First Minister has also said: “The Scottish Government was elected with a clear mandate to provide the people of Scotland with the information they need to make an informed choice about their future.”
Previously, SNP Westminster leader Stephen Flynn accused Case of having a “partisan political agenda” after the probe on independence spending was confirmed.
It came after Case told the Lords committee that “civil servants in Scotland and Wales can only spend their money on areas that are within their competence”, before confirming that the constitution is a reserved matter.
Flynn blasted the comments and said that any attempts to stop work on independence will only “boost support” even further.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel