SCOTTISH Labour’s by-election candidate's claim that he will go against Keir Starmer on controversial policies has been branded "not good enough" by the First Minister.
Michael Shanks, Labour’s candidate in the contest to replace former SNP MP Margaret Ferrier, who was removed through a recall petition, said he would vote to abolish the two-child benefit cap if he wins the seat.
However, First Minister Humza Yousaf rubbished the claims – and pointed out that Starmer would have to bring a vote on the issue for Shanks to go against it, something the UK Labour leader has repeatedly ruled out in recent weeks.
On Wednesday, both the SNP and Labour launched their campaigns for the hotly contested seat in Rutherglen.
READ MORE: Jackie Baillie insists Scottish Labour running Rutherglen by-election
Shanks described the two-child benefit limit as “heinous” in an apparent bid to distance himself from the position of Starmer, who previously said his party would not remove the policy if they win the next General Election.
The Labour candidate also said he was opposed to the bedroom tax, another controversial Tory policy which UK Labour frontbenchers have refused to rule out keeping if they win power.
Questioned about his position on the UK two-child benefit cap, Shanks said: “It’s a heinous policy, dreamt up by a Conservative party out of touch with people’s priorities.
“Scottish Labour is opposed to the two-child cap, we’ll continue to oppose it and I’ll campaign against it.”
Asked why he was seeking election within a party that has said it will not remove the cap, Shanks replied it was committed to other reforms of benefits that would put more money in people’s pockets.
“I’ll be fighting for a whole suite of measures to lift people out of poverty like Labour did when they were last in government,” he said.
On the bedroom tax, Shanks said he was opposed to the policy but claimed Labour may be unable to get rid of it when they first come to power if they intend to be “responsible with fiscal policy”.
“We can’t just announce spending commitments before we’ve decided where the money would come from,” he told journalists.
READ MORE: 'Out of depth' Rishi Sunak panned following LBC phone-in
Pressed on whether people in his constituency could be assured he would vote against policies backed by his prospective UK colleagues, Shanks answered: “I will campaign for the abolishment of both these things because they are heinous policies.”
However, the First Minister took issue with Shanks’s assertions about how he would vote.
Speaking to journalists at the launch of the SNP candidate Katy Loudon’s campaign less than a mile from the Labour launch, Yousaf said that voters face a “stark choice” between the two parties.
Challenged on Shanks’ assertions that he would not back such policies, Yousaf said he would only be able to vote against them if a Labour government brought them to a vote, adding: “I’m afraid the Labour MP will do whatever, I’m certain, Keir Starmer tells him to do – but not only that, you can’t vote for something if Keir Starmer refuses to even bring it to Parliament.”
It is “simply not good enough” for Shanks to be his party’s candidate while saying he would vote against them on certain issues, Yousaf said.
"It's not going to help the tens of thousands of children that are suffering and are in poverty as a result of the two-child limit," he said.
"It's not going to help the many families who are suffering in Rutherglen and Hamilton West because of those cruel Tory policies."
Yousaf also committed to moving as fast as possible to hold the by-election, with the earliest possible date being October 5.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel