THE BBC has dismissed a complaint against Fiona Bruce after she claimed the SNP had gone “off the rails” during the opening segment of an edition of Question Time.
Bruce came under fire for “unacceptable framing” and “editorialising” in the May 18 broadcast, which was filmed in Fort William.
She had introduced the BBC show by saying: “Tonight Question Time is in Scotland for the first time since the SNP came off the rails in such spectacular fashion.
“Following Nicola Sturgeon’s resignation and the arrest of high-profile SNP officials in the course of a police investigation into party finances, the audience here in Fort William want to know what it all means for Scotland and for the UK.”
#BBC Fiona Bruce intro & editorial at start of #bbcqt in Fort William: "Tonight Question Time for the first time since the SNP came off the rails in such spectacular fashion." Impossible to imagine Bruce or any BBC journo describe the UK Tories in such a manner. @bbcquestiontime pic.twitter.com/sBnvEKTcvO
— Gerry Hassan 🇺🇦 (@GerryHassan) May 18, 2023
The BBC’s executive complaints unit (ECU) reported on August 3 on its investigation into a complaint raised about Bruce’s framing of the SNP’s situation.
The ECU said: “A viewer complained that Fiona Bruce lacked impartiality in her handling of the panellists, in particular in her assertion that the SNP had ‘come off the rails’ since the programme last visited Scotland (which he also considered to be inaccurate).”
The unit considered whether the programme met BBC standards on due accuracy and impartiality, and judged that it had done so.
Dismissing the complaint, the ECU ruled that Bruce’s comment on the SNP had been a “professional judgment rooted in evidence” and as such was covered by the BBC’s editorial guidelines.
It said: “The BBC Editorial Guidelines allow presenters, reporters and correspondents to provide ‘professional judgments rooted in evidence’.
READ MORE: Jeremy Vine says people should be 'fired' for talking about Scottish independence
“In the ECU’s view Fiona Bruce’s comment about the SNP fell into that category and noted the SNP itself had publicly acknowledged the severity of the difficulties it faced, in terms arguably stronger than those used on the programme.
“Overall, the ECU considered all sides in the debate that evening were fairly challenged and if it appeared the SNP were under particular scrutiny this was as a result of their position as the Scottish Government and of recent events, rather than an indication of bias by the presenter or the BBC.”
The news comes from complaints reports which are made public on the BBC’s website every two weeks.
In the past, the BBC has cleared Bruce amid allegations of pro-Conservative bias on Question Time.
More recently, the ECU dismissed a complaint about a map of the UK which did not include Orkney or Shetland, claiming it could find “no inaccuracy”.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel