A LANDMARK Scottish museum is to address the state of its exhibit on the Massacre of Glencoe “as a priority” after concerns were raised, The National has been told.
It comes after concerns about fading on the lettering of the information panel on the exhibit, which meant even the number of MacDonalds killed in the 1692 massacre was illegible.
The exhibition in question is at the National Museum of Scotland, next to Greyfriars Kirkyard in central Edinburgh.
Its aim is to educate visitors on the slaughter of at least 38 men, women and children from clan MacDonald after King William III of England decided to make an example of them. Alasdair Maclain, the chief of the Glencoe MacDonalds, had been late in swearing fealty.
READ MORE: 'Remove Nazi symbols from Edinburgh Castle displays', Culture Secretary told
The National Museum of Scotland exhibit was further criticised for reporting that “only bad weather and misunderstandings prevented [Maclain] from taking the oath in good time”.
Chris McEleny, the general secretary of the Alba party, said: “Scotland’s story has been badly let down by a number of organisations over the years. It’s quite common to see Scottish history after the mid 17th-century written with a British tint.
“I would be hopeful that the National Museum of Scotland would address the aesthetics of their exhibit but much more could be done to tell the story of the Glencoe MacDonalds.
“To believe that bad weather was the only barrier to swearing an Oath of Allegiance to William II [of Scotland] is naive at best and ignorant at worst.”
McEleny went on: “The Massacre at Glencoe has a much more complex origin going back to Killiecrankie, and the bloody and brutal slaughter also shocked all of Scotland at the time.
“Unfortunately for the Scottish Jacobite cause, the end of the Williamite war in Ireland in 1690 meant that there wasn’t a Jacobite presence that could capitalise on the public mood, and sentiment in Scotland that was very unhappy with the brutal actions sanctioned by a foreign king based in London.
READ MORE: BBC throws out complaint over Fiona Bruce's 'SNP gone off the rails' claim
“If there is to be some investment to improve the condition of exhibitions there would be merit in trying not to explain complex events of Scottish history that spanned several years on one simple info board on the wall.”
A spokesperson for National Museums Scotland said that the exhibitions were now 25 years old and would be reviewed as part of an ongoing programme of work.
They said: “We regularly monitor damage to our displays and have a rolling programme of maintenance. The wear to this particular interpretation panel has already been logged and will be addressed as a priority.
“This display tells the story of the Massacre of Glencoe within the specific context of the development of state power. The story of the Jacobite challenge is told elsewhere in the museum.
“Our Scotland Galleries are now 25 years old and we are embarking on a programme of works to review and refresh them. Interpretation, including label text, will be reviewed as part of this project.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel