A SCOTTISH charity says it been left “deeply concerned” after Tory ministers have been accused of “inhumane” plans to cram 900 asylum seekers into Scots hotels by forcing them to share bedrooms.
The doubling up plan comes despite the UK Government already admitting that hotels are not “appropriate”.
It is understood that around 50,000 asylum seekers are being housed across the UK in Home Office run hotels.
READ MORE: Jeremy Vine panned for Scottish independence 'fired' comments
The policy also applies in Scotland where private firm Mears is responsible for finding temporary accommodation.
The Daily Record reports that a leaked letter from Home Office official Tim Rymer to SNP minister Emma Roddick (below) stated: “The Home Office is constantly challenging our accommodation suppliers to make best use of available asylum accommodation to reduce the need for more hotels and deliver the best value for money for the taxpayer.”
However, he added: “In order to deliver this we are working closely with our accommodation providers to optimise the existing space within the existing hotel estate.”
Rymer, who is the deputy director of adult and family asylum accommodation, added: “We recognise this may cause some concern.
“I would like to assure you that we will be doing this in line with all relevant statutory and legal requirements.”
The letter also revealed plans to increase the number of asylum seekers in hotels through the room share plan.
Several hotels across the country have been earmarked for a rise. The Brentwood hotel in Aberdeen has a current capacity of 114, but a planned rise of 107 through sharing would take the total to 211.
READ MORE: Labour call for greater 'use of private sector' in NHS care
Elsewhere, The Station Hotel in Perth could rise from 81 to 154 and The Patio Hotel in Aberdeen could jump from 165 to 346 under the proposals.
Overall, the new policy would squeeze 906 new people in fourteen hotels and the total revised maximum capacity would be 1863.
On the plans, Scottish Greens MSP Maggie Chapman (pictured below) said: “The complacent, cruel and inhumane hotels policy has been a disaster.
“It is a symptom of a brutal, racist and broken system that actively punishes some of the world’s most vulnerable people.”
Scottish charities have also hit out at the plans. Graham O’Neill, of the Scottish Refugee Council (SRC), said: “We are deeply concerned by plans to require people seeking asylum to share bedrooms.
“People coming to the UK seeking protection are often fleeing violence and oppression including abuse and gross invasions of privacy.
“As a result, being forced to live in such close proximity to strangers will lead to re-traumatisation of acutely vulnerable women and men.
READ MORE: Edinburgh Fringe: Nationalism takes centre stage in comic's new show
“It is an appalling, inhumane and irresponsible way to treat people seeking safety. We would urge the UK Government to abandon this cruel plan.
“We also urge the First Minister to personally intervene now and instruct his government to identify and pursue all legal and policy options to stop this inhumane forced bedroom sharing happening in Scotland.”
A Scottish Government spokesperson said: “The Home Office’s proposals to require unrelated people seeking asylum to share hotel rooms adds risk and stress for people at an already turbulent time.
“We firmly believe that the focus should instead be on improving the speed and quality of asylum decisions to reduce the time that people have to spend in hotel accommodation.
“The Scottish Government has received the letter from the Home Office and will respond in due course.”
A Home Office spokesperson said: “The pressure on the asylum system has continued to grow – there are currently more than 51,000 asylum seekers in hotels costing the UK taxpayer £6 million a day.’
“We are constantly working with our suppliers to make best use of available asylum accommodation to reduce the need for more hotels and deliver best value for money for the taxpayer.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel