STEPHEN Flynn has said he thinks that every SNP MP would rather be elected to Holyrood than to Westminster.
In an interview with The Herald, the SNP’s Westminster leader was asked about a variety of topics from the suspension of Angus MacNeil to his life in politics.
Flynn said that he is never in doubt “about the motives of any of my colleagues” and disagrees with the notion that any of them are “settled” in London.
“I struggle with the stuff about them settling down. It doesn’t marry with reality”, he told the newspaper.
READ MORE: Government considering sending migrants to Ascension Island
“What I see is a group of people who knock their pans in for the cause of independence. They make a lot of sacrifices.
“Why else would they have chosen to leave their families behind and, for many, rewarding and secure careers in other sectors?”
Asked if he would eventually like to pursue a career in Holyrood, Flynn (below) said: “I think almost all SNP MPs would prefer to be elected to Holyrood and not to Westminster.
“However, I won’t try to predict the future. I just need to be true to myself and hope we’re in a good place at the other side of the Westminster election.
“In a recent article I was described as the most ambitious nationalist ever. I am very ambitious, but for Scotland and that’s the most important thing.”
Angus MacNeil
When asked about MacNeil – who was suspended from the Westminster group following a bust-up with chief whip Brendan O’Hara – Flynn said what happens is “out of his hands”.
“For Angus, you don’t get to pick and choose when you get the whip. And maybe he’s beginning to realise that. I don’t have a problem with him having his own views on independence.
READ MORE: Mairi McAllan marries childhood sweetheart in South Lanarkshire
“I hope we can get to a point where there’s an amicable outcome, but this requires action on both sides.
“Angus is a good man, his heart’s in the right place. But I’ve been in politics long enough to know what that desired outcomes don’t always happen.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel