THE Supreme Court of India has granted bail in one of the cases against Jagtar Singh Johal in a “major breakthrough” six years after his arrest and torture.
Johal, known as Jaggi, from Dumbarton, was detained after he was accused of helping to fund a Sikh-on-Hindu assassination plot in India following his wedding in 2017, an accusation strongly denied by Johal and his family.
Previously, an investigation by the United Nations Working Group on Arbitrary Detention found there was no legal basis for his imprisonment.
READ MORE: Lee Anderson slammed as he tells migrants to 'f*** off back to France'
However, the 36-year-old has remained in custody in India while his family have relentlessly campaigned for his release.
And now, the Supreme Court of India upheld an earlier High Court decision by granting bail in one of the nine cases against Johal, rejecting the state’s appeal.
The Court found that his six-year continued imprisonment violated Johal’s rights under India’s constitution.
Johal (pictured below) will not be released on bail as the ruling only applies to one out of nine cases currently against him.
Human rights group Reprieve, which is assisting Johal and his family, called on the UK Government to reconsider its refusal to recognise his arbitrary detention and seek his release.
Foreign Secretary James Cleverly has previously refused to commit to seeking the release of Johal.
The Supreme Court rejected the Additional Solicitor General of India’s argument that the serious nature of the charges justified Jagtar’s continued imprisonment and asked to see the evidence against him.
However, when the prosecution provided nothing but witness statements, the Court dismissed its appeal against bail being granted. The Additional Solicitor General protested: "But your lordship he's a British national".
The judges responded: "We know how to keep foreign nationals safe in this country, don't worry. Dismissed".
READ MORE: Alex Chalk defends Lee Anderson's comments on migrants
Jaggi’s brother, Gurpreet Singh Johal, said of the ruling: “This is a major breakthrough in the case. It’s been almost six years but finally, we can see light at the end of the tunnel.
“We have known all along that Jagtar’s imprisonment was unjust – and now the highest court in India has recognised it.
“There is still much work to do, to get Jagtar home where he belongs, around the dinner table with us in Dumbarton, but today I feel more hopeful than I have in a very long time.”
Maya Foa, Reprieve’s director, said that the Supreme Court of India had rejected a “flimsy” case brought by the state.
“Prosecutors have had almost six years to build a case against Jagtar, since the moment he was snatched off the street and tortured into making a false confession,” she said.
“Today the Supreme Court of India rejected that flimsy case, finding that they simply do not have enough evidence to justify keeping Jagtar in prison.
“The Court’s resounding judgment this morning makes clear that Jagtar’s continued imprisonment is a terrible injustice, underscoring the UK Government's failure to recognise his arbitrary detention or seek his release.
READ MORE: Glasgow: Multiple police staff take unwell amid Altyre Street incident
“It is surely time for the UK to request his return to his family in Scotland."
We previously told how the UN working group cited multiple violations of Johal’s rights while he has been imprisoned in India, including claims he was tortured into signing a “false confession” through electric shocks to his ear lobes, nipples and genitals.
Criticism has been levelled at the UK Government for failing to secure Johal’s release, amid accusations that Tory ministers were prioritising a trade deal with India.
Martin Docherty-Hughes, the family’s MP, has been leading a cross-party campaign to secure Johal’s release.
Earlier this year, Johal’s family and the SNP MP marked 2000 days since the arrest of the Scot, and called on the UK Government to intervene.
The Foreign Office said it has “consistently” raised concerns over Johal’s case with the Indian Government, including the allegations of torture and right to a fair trial.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here