A SCOTTISH Government minister says the Home Office is “wilfully” misrepresenting its work on refugees.
Neil Gray, the Energy Secretary and one of Humza Yousaf's closest allies, hit out at the Tory government after the Home Office drew a comparison between its policy of using a barge to house asylum seekers and the use of cruise ships to house Ukrainian refugees.
Gray said it is not possible to compare the barge docked in Portland Port, Dorset, with the two cruise ships provided to people fleeing the war in Ukraine who arrived in Scotland.
READ MORE: Scottish Tories stay SILENT as Lee Anderson tells migrants to 'f*** off'
The SNP MSP was responding on Twitter to a Home Office post which said the UK Government is using a “tried and tested” approach, mirroring that taken in Scotland.
The two cruise ships, docked in Edinburgh and Glasgow, were used as temporary accommodation for displaced Ukrainians before new homes were found.
The Home Office’s statement noted that the first asylum seekers had arrived on the Bibby Stockholm barge.
Wilful misrepresentation of ScotGov providing *temporary*, but popular, accom. to displaced Ukrainians, working with @scotrefcouncil @UKRinEdinburgh @AUGBEdinburgh & Councils to provide full support services during humanitarian crisis. We welcomed, you’re deterring. Incomparable https://t.co/rodZwZndbi
— Neil Gray MSP (@neilcgray) August 8, 2023
It said: “The number of people on board will increase gradually with more arrivals later this week and in the coming months, as part of a carefully structured phased approach.
“This marks a further step forward in the Government’s work to bring forward alternative accommodation options as part of its pledge to reduce the use of expensive hotels and move to a more orderly, sustainable system which is more manageable for local communities.
“This is a tried and tested approach that mirrors that taken by our European neighbours, the Scottish Government and offers better value for the British taxpayer.”
Gray, who was previously the Scottish minister with special responsibility for Ukrainian refugees, said this was “wilful misrepresentation of ScotGov providing temporary, but popular, accom. to displaced Ukrainians”.
He tweeted: “We welcomed, you’re deterring. Incomparable.”
READ MORE: Scottish Labour criticised for conflating SNP and civil servants in credit card row
SNP MP Peter Grant also hit back, commenting: "You do realise that this is a pack of lies?
"What you’re subjecting people to in Portland bears no comparison to how Scotland treated Ukrainian refugees."
A Scottish Government spokesperson said: “We have repeatedly urged the UK Government to improve the asylum system to make it humane and fit for purpose for people who are fleeing trauma and violence.
“We have made clear that vessels are not suitable accommodation for people seeking asylum, not least because of the strict restrictions on people including having no right to work and no recourse to public funds – a punitive policy which prevents access to most mainstream benefits.
“If the UK Government chooses to impose the use of vessels to accommodate people anywhere in Scotland we have said it must be accompanied by suitable funding for councils and public services like health so that people can be welcomed and supported appropriately.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel