THE Bute House agreement offers “certainty”, Stephen Flynn has said, as he poured cold water on the possibility of an SNP conference vote on the deal with the Scottish Greens.
During a campaign event in Cambuslang, the SNP Westminster leader told journalists that the deal helps the party to pass budgets and “govern effectively” after growing calls for party members to be allowed a vote on the deal negotiated by former first minister Nicola Sturgeon.
Former SNP leadership contender Kate Forbes backed calls for a “check in” with the party membership over the co-operation deal with the Greens, which gives the party two ministers in the Scottish Government.
READ MORE: Nicola Sturgeon’s memoir to be published after nine-way bidding war
Forbes suggested that a ballot could take place at the party’s conference in October, but Flynn suggested that this might not come to fruition.
Speaking to journalists after campaigning with Rutherglen and Hamilton West by-election candidate Katy Loudoun, Flynn said: “I don't think it's necessarily a case of someone being allowed a vote or otherwise.
“In terms of party conference, some people would have to come forward with a proposal, and there's obviously different mechanisms behind the scenes in terms of how the party allows something onto the agenda.
“So I don't know whether that would be something which could happen or otherwise, but at the end of the day, we're all democrats and we're always allowed to disagree without being disagreeable.”
Flynn added that the key issue from his perspective was that there is “certainty” in Holyrood allowing the SNP-led Scottish Government to “govern effectively”.
“Obviously, the Bute House agreement helps us to do just that, and if anyone's advocating something alternative to that they're gonna have to lay out their proposals in a lot more detail.
“Because what we do know is that through the agreement we can get budgets passed, we can get a policy agenda in place and that certainty is important, not just to us in terms of our legislative agenda, but to the public as well.
“And I don't think the public would necessarily take kindly to us navel gazing at a time when they're having to deal with the real issues of the day, namely the cost of living crisis.”
READ MORE: Hardeep Singh Kohli arrested following sexual offence allegations
Flynn added that the support of Scottish Green votes in the Scottish Parliament offers “certainty” in a “very challenging political landscape”.
He added: “Whether we like it or not, Holyrood is very polarised and we need to make sure that we can offer certainty to the people of Scotland in terms of budgets, we need to make sure that we can offer certainty to the people of Scotland in terms of the policy agenda that's being taken forward and the ability to deliver upon that.
“I think in real terms that certainty at this moment in time is hugely important because in every aspect of life people's lives are very uncertain.”
Earlier, we told how Forbes joined two other former SNP ministers to call for a ballot on the co-operation agreement which has seen the Greens backing the SNP minority government since 2021 under Nicola Sturgeon.
Both Fergus Ewing and Alex Neil have both said members should have a say when the party conference takes place in October.
After Humza Yousaf won the SNP leadership contest, he reiterated his support for the deal and met with the Scottish Greens co-leaders Patrick Harvie and Lorna Slater following his win.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel