THE SNP candidate for the upcoming Rutherglen by-election has accused Labour of “sticking their head in the sand” over Brexit, with figures showing the area has lost out on millions of pounds in EU trade.
Katy Loudon, who is bidding to hold the seat for the SNP, challenged her Labour rival to outline his position and what other principles he is “prepared to sell out on”.
Michael Shanks previously quit Labour over the party’s stance on Brexit, describing its approach to EU membership as “bankrupt”, but rejoined and is standing for the party in Rutherglen and West Hamilton.
Last week he tried to distance himself from UK leader Sir Keir Starmer (below) by saying he still sees the UK as “having a place in the European Union” – but added it’s “not a question for just now”.
Starmer has said that under a Labour government, Britain will not go back into the EU – including ruling out any return to the single market or customs union – and will aim instead to “make Brexit work”.
The SNP said figures obtained from the House of Commons Library show that South Lanarkshire has lost £146 million on EU imports and exports since Brexit, as well as almost £10m in direct EU funding.
Since leaving the EU, exports from South Lanarkshire to the European Union are down by 36% – £108m – and imports are down by 12% – or £38m.
Loudon said: “I see the damaging impact Brexit is having on the people in Rutherglen and Hamilton West every day – yet Starmer’s man in Rutherglen is opting to pick and choose his principles and stick his head in the sand.
“It seems to have escaped his memory that he left Labour over their ‘bankrupt approach to Brexit’ – choosing instead to trot out the HQ-approved line on EU membership from his pro-Brexit bosses down the road.
“People are suffering right now as a result of the Brexit that Labour fully support – it’s drained millions from our community in lost exports and direct funding, piling more misery on households already struggling to make ends meet in this Westminster cost of living crisis.
“Brexit was roundly rejected by 63% in South Lanarkshire. Voters here deserve a candidate who will stand up for what they believe in – not abandon their principles.”
She added: “A vote for the SNP in Rutherglen and Hamilton West is a vote to reject the failure of Brexit, tackle the cost of living crisis in full and rejoin the world’s largest single market with EU membership.”
In an interview last week, asked if he would like the UK to rejoin the EU one day, Shanks said: “I think it’s not a question for just now, but I still see the UK as having a place in the European Union.
READ MORE: Alyn Smith writes to Home Office over detained Stirling student
“So yes, if it got to a point where there was clearly a public appetite for the conversation again, I wouldn’t be against us rejoining the European Union. Of course not.
“Because I have not changed my principles or the idea that the European project is good for all of us.”
He added: “But I do think even that conversation becomes just such a distraction from actually making what we’ve got work just now.”
Shanks has also faced criticism for claiming that he will go against Starmer’s stance on keeping controversial policies such as the two-child benefit cap and bedroom tax.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel