THE UK Government has been told to back off from attempting to “involve themselves in devolved areas” after a row over NHS waiting times.
The row erupted after the UK Health Secretary claimed he is “open to requests” from patients in Scotland and Wales to be treated by NHS England amid record waiting lists.
Steve Barclay invited Scottish and Welsh ministers to discuss “what lessons can be learnt” from approaches taken by different governments to the health service across the UK.
READ MORE: Stone of Destiny students 'identified by British State moles in nationalist movement'
He claimed that the two nations have worse NHS delays than England in some areas - a claim robustly disputed by both devolved administrations.
However, both Scottish Health Secretary Michael Matheson and the Welsh Government hit back at the suggestion and criticised the UK Government’s record.
Matheson (below) pointed to junior doctor's strikes impacting services in England, strikes that the Scottish Government have managed to avoid going ahead.
In England, waiting lists hit a record 7.57 million people in June alone, leading Prime Minister Rishi Sunak to make one of his key priorities bringing the number down.
In a press release, the Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) said there are “significant variations” in NHS waiting times between the four UK nations.
“In Wales, more than 73,000 people are waiting over 77 weeks for treatment, and at least 21,600 people are waiting over 78 weeks for an outpatient, day case or inpatient appointment in Scotland,” it said.
READ MORE: SNP's policy convener calls for 'transparency' from MSPs in opposition to Greens deal
“In England, waiting times for patients over 78 weeks have been virtually eliminated.”
Scottish Health Secretary Matheson pointed to record waiting lists and ongoing strikes hitting the NHS England as examples of problems affecting the service south of the border.
“The NHS in England is about to experience its fifth round of strikes by junior doctors, with the waiting list for hospital treatment rising by over 100,000 to a record high of over 7.5 million as a result of the UK Government’s refusal to even get around the negotiating table,” he said.
“Rather than attempting to involve themselves in devolved areas, the UK Government would be well served focusing on tackling the many issues in the health service south of the border.
“In contrast, the Scottish Government has negotiated constructively and made significant commitments to our junior doctors – which is why we are the only part of the UK to have avoided strike action in our NHS this year.”
The Welsh Government did not take kindly to the attack from the UK Government either.
READ MORE: ‘People pick up on flip-flopping from Labour’, says Katy Loudon
“Wales includes more referrals in its waiting times statistics than England does,” a spokesman said.
“Long waiting times are falling every month in Wales and have more than halved in the past year.
“The overall growth in waiting lists in Wales has been smaller in Wales than in England over the last 12 months – it grew by 3.6% in Wales and by 12.1% in England. Wales has also outperformed England in major emergency department performance in nine out of the last 10 months.
“In Wales, patients are treated according to clinical urgency.”
Wales Secretary David TC Davies insisted his Cabinet colleague’s invitation was an attempt to “put people before politics”, telling Times Radio many of his constituents say they would “love” to be treated in England.
But shadow health secretary Wes Streeting said: “The only advice the Tories are qualified to offer is how to wreck the NHS and cause the biggest strikes in its history.”
READ MORE: FM wants unit to respond to misleading independence claims to be ready by autumn
Shadow education secretary Bridget Phillipson told Sky News on Sunday that Barclay is “the last person anyone needs a lecture from” on how to run the NHS.
She accused the UK Government of creating a “total shambles” in the NHS and said devolved governments are restricted in what they can do by budgets determined in Westminster.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel