THE SNP’s governing partnership with the Greens is not the reason the party are seeing their popularity drop, a polling expert has insisted.
A raft of SNP politicians including Fergus Ewing, Kate Forbes and Joanna Cherry have said the Bute House Agreement should be reviewed or renegotiated, with Ewing branding the Greens “hard-left extremists” that have “tarnished” his party.
But Professor John Curtice has dismissed the idea that the deal is the main reason why the SNP have seen a shift in the polls.
He told the BBC’s Good Morning Scotland: “We have had three opinion polls, which have asked people whether or not they think the arrangement is good for Scotland.
“It won’t surprise you to hear given we are talking about the two parties that in May 2021 got half of the vote between them in the Holyrood election, that the opinion polls are also divided.
READ MORE: Patrick Harvie says Greens electoral success 'scares some people'
“Two polls had more people thinking it was bad, and one had it the other way around. The truth is a lot of the people who say it is bad are the people who didn’t vote for the SNP or the Greens back in the Scottish Parliament election.”
Curtice has instead continued to insist that the SNP leadership contest is what has inflicted the most damage to the party.
In a piece for Bylines Scotland last week, Curtice said it was actually the main culprit amid speculation that other events have caused the SNP’s fortunes to change, including the arrests of Nicola Sturgeon and Peter Murrell.
“A lot of other things have been going on, like the change in the SNP leader and the leadership election, which doesn’t seem to have done the SNP any good," he said.
“If we look at the timeline of when SNP support went down, it was slipping a bit before Nicola Sturgeon resigned and it has slipped a bit since, but primarily it was during the leadership contest and the election of Humza Yousaf.
“It is up to them to look at their partners in government, and the SNP is not looking at the principle source of their political difficulties.”
The agreement was signed in 2021 and made Green MSPs Patrick Harvie and Lorna Slater junior ministers in the Scottish Government.
READ MORE: Tory MSP Sandesh Gulhane to run for Westminster in East Renfrewshire
But a number of policies championed by the Greens including gender reform and the Deposit Return Scheme have led to splits within the SNP.
MP Cherry said at a Fringe event last week it should be renegotiated and discussed by the party, adding that the SNP should not fear a review of something that should “perhaps be terminated or made better”.
She later dismissed “misleading” headlines that suggested she said it should be “ripped up”.
Forbes, meanwhile, has called for a party conference debate on the issue but has said she would not want a vote that simply said “Greens out or Greens in”.
She told Iain Dale and Jacqui Smith’s For the Many Live show last week that she wants to debate the substance of the deal, insisting that “co-operation matters”.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel